Abstract
We investigated the internal structure of words in the mental lexicon by using a crossword puzzle paradigm. In two experiments, subjects were presented with word fragments along with a semantic cue, and were asked to retrieve the whole word that contained the presented fragment and was compatible with the semantic information. In Experiment 1, we found that any cluster of three adjacent letters facilitated retrieval better than dispersed letters. Moreover, syllabic clusters had a greater facilitative effect than nonsyllabic pronounceable clusters or nonpronounceable clusters. In Experiment 2, we found that syllable units facilitated retrieval better than morphemic units. The results are interpreted as evidence for the existence of lexical subunits that are larger than the letter but smaller than the word, and that are organized according to phonologic principles. We propose an interactive model for how crossword puzzles are solved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aronoff, M. (1976).Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role ot word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357
Chomsky, N., &Halle, M. (1968).The soundpauern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Dolinsky, R. (1973) Word fragments as recall cues Role of syllables.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 272–274.
Hansen, D., &Rodgers, T. S. (1965). An exploration of psychohnguistlc units in initial reading.Proceedings of the Symposium on the Psycholingutstic Nature of the Reading Process. Detroit: Wayne State University.
Horowitz, L. M., White, M. A., &Atwood, D. W. (1968). Word fragments as an aid to recall. The organization of a word.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 219–226.
Kahn, D. (1976).Syllable-based generalization in English phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Boston. Reproduced by the Indiana Umversity Lingmstic Club.
Kay, J., &Marcel, A. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of non-lexical rules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 397–413.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press
Lima, S. D., &Pollatsek, A. (1983). The Basic Orthographic Syllainc Structure (BOSS) recortsidered: Lextcal access via an orthographic code?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 310–322.
Marcel, A. J. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U., &Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 298–305.
Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.
Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., &Rho, S. H. (1986). How to see a reading unit.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 461–475.
Segul J. (1984). The syllable: A basic perceptual unit in speech processnlg? In H Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention andperformance X: Control of language processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spoehr, K. T. (1978). Phonological recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learntng& Verbal Behavior,17, 127–141
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,5, 71–89.
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. (1975). The role of orthographic and phonotacfic rules in perceiving letter patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,1, 21–34.
Taft, M (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learnmg & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39.
Taft, M., &,Forster, K I. (1975). Lexlcal storage and retrieval of prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior.14, 638–647.
Uunderwood, B J., &Schulz, R W (1960).Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Chicago: Lippmcott.
Webster’s new worm dictionary of the American language. (1964). New York: World.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD-09144 to Haskins Laboratories. The study is based on a master’s thesis presented by the first author to the Department of Psychology at The Hebrew Umversity.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldblum, N., Frost, R. The crossword puzzle paradigm: The effectiveness of different word fragments as cues for the retrieval of words. Mem Cogn 16, 158–166 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213485
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213485