Abstract
Three experiments were conducted to test whether visual mental images and visual perceptual representations possess equivalent structural properties and undergo functionally equivalent comparison processes. In Experiment 1, subjects were required to perform asame-different letter classification in which the two letters were shown in succession. The first letter in the pair either was actually presented (perceptual condition) or had to be actively generated (imaginal condition). Both conditions showed that (1) response latencies fordifferent decisions decreased as a function of the degree of difference (segment effect), and (2) same decisions were faster than the fastestdifferent ones (fast same effect). In Experiment 2, the imaginal condition only was employed, but no imagery instructions were given and very strict time constraints were assigned. In spite of these restrictions, subjects apparently generated and used visual images, as attested by the fact that the results were comparable to those of the previous experiment. In Experiment 3, three experimental manipulations were introduced to prevent the use of visual images. Such manipulations proved effective, as shown by the disappearance of the segment effect. It was concluded that in the visual modality images and percepts are equivalent in structure and are processed in a very similar way.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bagnara, S., Boles, D. B., Simion, F., &Umiltà, C. (1982). Can an analytic/holistic dichotomy explain hemispheric asymmetries?Cortex,18, 67–78.
Bagnara, S., Boles, D. B., Simion, F., &Umiltà, C. (1983). Symmetry and similarity effects in the comparison of wsual patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 578–584.
Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction times and errors forsame-different judgments of multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 169–174.
Banks, W. P. (1981). Assessing relations between inmgery and perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptton & Performance,7, 844–847.
Berbaum, K., &Chung, C. P. (1981). Müller-Lyer illusion induced by imagination.Journal of Mental Imagery,5, 125–128.
Berry, D., &Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationshlp between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,36A, 209–231.
Brooks, L. R. (1967). The suppression of visualization by readingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,19, 289–299.
Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recallCanadian Journal of Psychology,22, 349–368.
Brooks, L. R. (1970). An extension of the conflict between wsualization and reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 91–96.
Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometnc studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 75–176). New York. Academic Press.
Corballis, M. C. (1986). Is mental rotation controlled or automatic?Memory & Cognition,14, 124–128.
Farell, B. (1985). “Same”-“different” judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisonsPsychological Bulletin,98, 419–456.
Finke, R. A. (1980). Levels of equivalence in imagery and perceptionPsychological Review,87, 113–132.
Finke, R. A. (1985). Theories relating mental imagery to perception.Psychological Bulletin,98, 236–259.
Finke, R. A., Kurtzman, H. S. (1981). Area and contrast effects upon perceptual and imaginal acuity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 825–832.
Finke, R. A., &Pinker, S. (1982). Spontaneous imagery scanmng in mental extrapolation.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,8, 142–147.
Finke, R. A., &Pinker, S. (1983). Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 126–132.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1981). Experimenter naivet6 and imaginal judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 833–843.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1983) Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters’ expections?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 394–412.
Keenan, J. M (1983). Qualifications and clarifications of images of concealed objects: A reply to Kerr and Neisser.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cogmtion,9, 222–230.
Kolers, P. A. (1983). Perception and representation.Anmatl Review of Psychology,34, 129–166
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Alper, S. N. (1977). On the pictortal properties of visual images: Effects of image size on memory for words.Canadian Journal of Psychology,31, 32–40.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T M., &,Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of miage scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 47–60.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pinker, S., Smith, G. E., &Shwartz, S. P. (1979). On the demystification of mental imagery.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,2, 535–581
Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. J., Fliegel, S. L. (1983) Generating visual images: Units and relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 278–303.
Krueger, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching.Psychological Review,85, 278–304.
Krueger, L. E. (1983). Probing Proctor’s priming principle: The effect of simultaneous and sequential presentation on same-dtfferent judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 511–523.
Krueger, L. E. (1984). Self-termination in same-different judgments. Multrletter comparison with simultaneous and sequential presentationJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cogmnition,10, 271–284.
Nickerson, R. S. (1978). On the time it takes to tell things apart. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 77–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction.Cognition,18, 1–63.
Pinker, S., Choate, P. A., &Finke, R. A (1984). Mental extrapolation in patterns constructed from memory.Memory & Cognition,14, 207–218.
Podgorny, P., &Shepard, R. N. (1978). Functional representations common to visual perception and imaginationJournal of Experlmental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 21–35.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometrtc explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching-task phenomena.Psychologtcal Review,88, 291–326.
Proctor, R. W., &Rao, K. V. (1983). Reinstating the original principles of Proctor’s unified theory for matching-task phenomena: An evaluation of Krueger and Shapiro’s reformulation.Psychological Revlew,90, 21–37.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate. Analogue media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review,88, 16–45.
Reeves, A. (1980). Visual imagery in backward masking.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 118–124.
Shepard, R. N. (1975). Form, formation, and transformation of internal representations. In R. Solso (Ed.),lnformatton processing and cognttion: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 87–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagimng, thinking, and dreaming.Psychologtcal Review,91, 417–447.
Shepard, R. N., Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Shepard, R. N., &Podgorny, P. (1978). Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes: Vol. 5. Human information processing (pp. 189–237). Hdlsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Taylor, D. A. (1976). Holistic and analytic processes in the compartson of letters.Perception & Psychophystcs,20, 187–190.
Tversky, B (1969). Pictorial and verbal encoding in a short-term memory task.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 225–233.
Wallace, B (1984). Apparent equivalence between perception and unagery in the production of various wsual allusions.Memory & Cogration,12, 156–162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by funds from the Consigho Nasionale delle Ricerche and the Minlstero della Pubblica Istruzione.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bagnara, S., Simion, F., Tagliabue, M.E. et al. Comparison processes on visual mental images. Mem Cogn 16, 138–146 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213483
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213483