Abstract
Five experiments employing an incidental learning procedure explored the effects of different input modalities on the long-term retention of word lists. In each of the first four experiments, mixed-mode presentations featuring three different modes of presentation were employed. In the baseline presentation mode in each experiment, subjects were to read words silently. In the two additional presentation modes, subjects were to vocalize or read and hear (Experiment 1), read and hear or mouth (Experiment 2), vocalize or write (Experiment 3), and vocalize or write without seeing the written word (Experiment 4). In Experiment 5, separate groups of subjects were presented with pure-mode lists that they were to read silently, write without seeing, write and see, mouth, hear, read and hear, or vocalize. The principal findings were that auditory presentation procedures led to best memory performance and that, of these, only vocalization was found to consistently enhance retention. These findings are conceptualized within a framework that proposes that both the temporal distinctiveness of auditory information and self-generated cues are employed in the process of retrieval.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practtce. London. MIT Press.
Campbell, R., &Dodd, B. (1980). Hearing by eye.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 85–99.
Conway, M. A., &Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and longterm memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 341–361.
Crowder, R. G., &Morton, J (1969). Precategoncal acoustic storage (PAS).Perception & Psychophysics,5, 365–373.
Gardiner, J. M. (1983). On recency and echoic memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,302, 267–282.
Gathercole, S. E. (1986). The modality effect and articulation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 461–474.
Glenberg, A. M. (1984). A retrieval account of the modality effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognttion,10, 526–541.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &Cognttion,12, 3–15.
Greene, R. L. (1985). Constraams on the long-term modahty effect.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 526–541
Luce, D. R. (1959).Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Nairne, J. S., &Pusen, C. (1984). Serial recall of imagined voices.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 331–342.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).
Shand, M. A., &Klima, E. S. (1981). Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 464–474.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press.
Turner, M. L., LaPointe, L. B., Cantor, J., Reeves, C. H., Griffeth, R. H., &Engle, R. W. (1987). Recency and suffix effects found with auditory presentation and with mouthed visual presentaOon: They’re not the same thing.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 138–164.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1980). The modality effect and echoic persistence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 251–278.
Winer, B. (1971).Statisttcal principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Both authors contributed equally to this research, which was supported by the Medical Research Council of Great Britain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gathercole, S.E., Conway, M.A. Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalization leads to best retention. Mem Cogn 16, 110–119 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213478
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213478