Abstract
The Serbo-Croatian language is written in two alphabets, Roman and Cyrillic. Both orthographies transcribe the sounds of the language in a regular and straightforward fashion and may, therefore, be referred to as phonologically shallow in contrast to English orthography, which is phonologically deep. Most of the alphabet characters are unique to one alphabet or the other. There are, however, a number of shared characters, some of which receive the same reading and some of which receive a different reading, in the two alphabets. It is possible, therefore, to construct a variety of types of letter strings. Some of these can be read in only one way and can be either a word or nonsense. Other letter strings can be pronounced one way if read as Roman and in a distinctively different way if read as Cyrillic and can be words in both alphabets—but different words; or they can be nonsense in both alphabets or nonsense in one alphabet and a word in the other. In a lexical decision task conducted with bialphabetical readers, it was shown that words that can be read in two different ways are accepted more slowly and with greater error than words that can be read only one way. It was concluded that for the phonologically shallow writing systems of Serbo-Croatian, lexical decision proceeds with reference to the phonology.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Meyer, D. E., & Ruddy, M.Lexical memory retrieval based on graphemic and phonemic representations of printed words. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, November 1973.
References
Anderson, J. R.Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Baron, J. Mechanisms for pronouncing printed words: Use and acquisition. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Baron, J., &Strawson, C. Use of orthographic and wordspecific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 386–393.
Brooks, L. R. Visual pattern in fluent word identification. In A. Reber & D. Scarborough (Eds.),Towards a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Chomsky, N. Phonology and reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T., &Besner, D. Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. London: Academic Press, 1977.
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 391–402.
Forster, K. I. Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976.
Goodman, K. The 13th easy way to make learning to read difficult: A reaction to Gleitman and Rozin.Reading Research Quarterly, 1973,8, 484–493.
Kolers, P. Three stages of reading. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
Liberman, I., Liberman, A., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. Orthography and the beginning reader. In J. Kavanaugh & R. Venesky (Eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, in press.
Lukatela, G., Savić, M., Gligorijević, B., Ognjenović, P., &Turvey, M. T. Bi-alphabetical lexical decision.Language andSpeech, 1978,21, 142–165.
Lukatela, G., Savić, M., Ognjenović, P., &Turvey, M. T. On the relation between processing the Roman and the Cyrillic alphabets: A preliminary analysis with hi-alphabetical readers.Language and Speech, 1978,21, 113–141.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. Some Experiments On The Roman and Cyrillic alphabets of Serbo-Croatian. In J. Kavanaugh & R. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, in press.
Lukić, V. [Active written vocabulary of pupils at the elementary school age]. Belgrade: Zavod za Izdavanje Udzbenika SR Srbije, 1970.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321.
Morton, J. Interaction Of Information In Word Recognition.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 165–178.
Morton, J. A Functional Model For Memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. Attention And Cognitive Control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Rozin, P., &Gleitman, L. R. The Structure And Acquisition Of reading If. The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In A. Reber & D. Scarborough (Eds.),Towards a psychology of reading. Hillsdate, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Rubenstein, H. R., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971,10, 645–657.
Smith, F.Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NICHD Grant HD-08495 to the University of Belgrade and in part by NICHD Grant HD-01994 to Haskins Laboratories.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lukatela, G., Popadić, D., Ognjenović, p. et al. Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography. Mem Cogn 8, 124–132 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213415
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213415