Abstract
The performance measures in many experiments on animal memory are expected to have an underlying binomial distribution, with additional variance contributed, for example, by between- subject differences. This paper examines whether the data from published studies of serial position effects (primacy and recency) in animals’ working memory conform to that expectation. In most cases, the variance, when it can be estimated, is consistent with those statistical assumptions, but in certain studies, it is significantly smaller than expected. This is usually a sign of faulty procedure or analysis, and possible causes are discussed. The conclusion is that much of the evidence for primacy in animals is unsatisfactory, on statistical or other methodological grounds. The analytic approach outlined here might usefully be applied to detect potential problems with other experiments of a similar type, especially when manually operated apparatus is employed, and to improve their statistical power.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aggleton, J. P. (1985). One-trial object recognition by rats.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 279–294.
Bolhuis, J. J., &van Kampen, H. S. (1988). Serial position curves in spatial memory of rats: Primacy and recency effects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40B, 135–149.
Buchanan, J. P., Gill, T. V., &Braggio, J. T. (1981). Serial position and clustering effects in a chimpanzee’s “free recall.”Memory & Cognition,9, 651–660.
Caunt, J. (1990).Spatial memory in rats: Primacy and recency effects in the serial position curve. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis, University of Reading.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Cook, R. G., Brown, M. F., &Riley, D. A. (1985). Flexible memory processing by rats: Use of prospective and retrospective infor mation in the radial maze.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,11, 453–469.
Dale, R. H. I. (1987). Similarities between human and animal spatial memory: Item and order information.Animal Learning and Behavior,15, 293–300.
DiMattia, B. V., &Kesner, R. P. (1984). Serial position curves in rats: Automatic vs. effortful information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 557–563.
DiMattia, B. V., &Kesner, R. P. (1988). Role of the posterior parietal association cortex in the processing of spatial event information.Behavioral Neuroscience,102, 397–403.
Gaffan, D. (1977). Recognition memory after short retention intervals in fornix-transected monkeys.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 577–588.
Gaffan, D. (1983). A comment on primacy effects in monkeys’ memory for lists.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 144–145.
Gaffan, D., &Weiskrantz, L. (1980). Recency effects and lesion effects in delayed nonmatching to randomly baited samples by monkeys.Brain Research,196, 373–386.
Gaffan, E. A., &Gaffan, D. (in press). Less than expected variability in evidence for primacy and von Restorff effects in rats’ nonspatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Hays, W. L. (1988).Statistics (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Hitch, G. J. (1983). Short-term memory processes in humans and animals. In A. Mayes (Ed.),Memory in animals and humans: Some comparisons and their theoretical implications (pp. 177–202). Wokingham, U.K.: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Hitch, G. J. (1985). Short-term memory and information processing in humans and animals: Towards an integrative framework. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.),Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 119–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kesner, R. P., Adelstein, T., &Crutcher, K. A. (1987). Rats with nucleus basalis magnocellularis lesions mimic mnemonic symptomatology observed in patients with dementia of Alzheimer’s type.Behavioral Neuroscience,101, 451–456.
Kesner, R. P., Adelstein, T., &Crutcher, K. A. (1989). Equivalent spatial location memory deficits in rats with medial septum or hippocampal formation lesions and patients with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type.Brain & Cognition,9, 289–300.
Kesner, R. P., Crutcher, K., &Beers, D. R. (1988). Serial position curves for item (spatial location) information: Role of the dorsal hippocampal formation and medial septum.Brain Research,454, 219–226.
Kesner, R. P., Crutcher, K. A., &Measom, M. O. (1986). Medial septal and nucleus basalis magnocellularis lesions produce order memory deficits in rats which mimic symptomatology of Alzheimer’s disease.Neurobiology of Aging,7, 287–295.
Kesner, R. P., &Gray, M. L. (1989). Dissociation of order and item memory following parietal cortex lesions in the rat.Behavioral Neuroscience,103, 907–910.
Kesner, R. P., &Holbrook, T. (1987). Dissociation of item and order spatial memory in rats following medial prefrontal cortex lesions.Neuropsychologia,25, 653–664.
Kesner, R. P., Measom, M. O., Forsman, S. L., &Holbrook, T.H. (1984). Serial-position curves in rats: Order memory for episodic spatial events.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 378–382.
Kesner, R. P., &Novak, J. M. (1982). Serial position curve in rats: Role of the dorsal hippocampus.Science,218, 173–175.
Macphail, E. M. (1980). Short-term visual recognition memory in pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 521–538.
Maki, W. S., Beatty, W. W., &Clouse, B. (1984). Item and order information in spatial memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 437–452.
Moss, M. B., Rosene, D. L., &Peters, A. (1988). Effects of aging on visual recognition memory in the rhesus monkey.Neurobiology of Aging,9, 495–502.
Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., &Wood, E. R. (1990). Nonrecurringitems delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: A new paradigm for testing nonspatial working memory.Psychobiology,18, 321–326.
Murray, E. A., &Mishkin, M. (1984). Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience,4, 2565–2580.
O’Brien, R. G., &Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer.Psychological Bulletin,97, 316–333.
Overman, W. H., McLain, C., Ormsby, G. E., &Brooks, V. (1983). Visual recognition memory in squirrel monkeys.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 483–488.
Rawlins, J. N. P.,Deacon, R. M.,Chih-Ta, T., &Aggleton, J. P. (in press). Doubts concerning primacy in rats’ nonspatial recognition memory: A reply to Gaffan and Gaffan.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Reed, P. (in press). Fewer doubts concerning rats’ serial position performance: A reply to Gaffan and Gaffan, and Rawlins, Deacon, Chih Ta and Aggleton.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Reed, P., Chih-Ta, T., Aggleton, J. P., &Rawlins, J. N. P. (1991). Primacy, recency and the von Restorff effect in rats’ nonspatial recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 36–44.
Roberts, S. (1987). Less-than-expected variability in evidence for three stages in memory formation.Behavioral Neuroscience,101, 120–125.
Roberts, W. A., &Kraemer, P. J. (1981). Recognition memory for lists of visual stimuli in monkeys and humans.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 587–594.
Roberts, W. A., &Kraemer, P. J. (1984). Picture memory in monkeys.Canadian Journal of Psychology,38, 218–236.
Roberts, W. A., &Smythe, W. E. (1979). Memory for lists of spatial events in the rat.Learning & Motivation,10, 313–336.
Rothblat, L. A., &Hayes, L. L. (1987). Short-term object recognition memory in the rat: Nonmatching with trial-unique junk stimuli.Behavioral Neuroscience,101, 587–590.
Sands, S. R., &Wright, A. A. (1980). Primate memory: Recognition of serial list items by a rhesus monkey.Science,209, 938–939.
Santiago, H. C., &Wright, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory: Samedifferent concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial position function.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 498–512.
Shimp, C. P. (1976). Short-term memory in the pigeon: Relative recency.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,25, 55–61.
Thompson, R. K. R., &Herman, L. M. (1977). Memory for lists of sounds by the bottle-nosed dolphin: Convergence of memory processes with humans?Science,195, 501–503.
Wright, A. A. (1989). Memory processing by pigeons, monkeys and people. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 25–70). New York: Academic Press.
Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., &Sands, S. F. (1984). Monkey memory: Same-different concept learning, serial probe acquisition and probe delay effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 513–529.
Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., Sands, S. F., Kendrick, D. F., &Cook, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys and people.Science,229, 287–289.
Wright, A. A., &Watkins, M.J. (1987). Animal learning and memory and their relation to human learning and memory.Learning & Motivation,18, 131–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I thank D. Gaffan, P. T. Smith, V. M. LoLordo, and anonymous reviewers for helpful contributions to this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaffan, E.A. Primacy, recency, and the variability of data in studies of animals’ working memory. Animal Learning & Behavior 20, 240–252 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213378
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213378