Abstract
If, while responding on a variable interval schedule, rats are given a brief cue prior to reward, their response rate is markedly lower than the rate for yoked partners who receive the cue randomly with respect to reward. This signaled-reward phenomenon has been explained in terms of sign tracking. Two experiments reported here replicated the phenomenon and examined sign tracking directly through visual inspection of the animals’ behavior. Although sign tracking did, indeed, occur more in the signaled reward condition, it did not fully account for the difference in response rates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albert, D. J., &Mah, C. J. (1972). An examination of conditioned reinforcement using a one-trial learning procedure.Learning and Motivation,3, 369–388.
Hall, G. (1982). Effects of a brief stimulus accompanying reinforcement on instrumental responding in pigeons.Learning and Motivation,13, 26–43.
Holland, P. C. (1980). Second-order conditioning with and without unconditioned stimulus presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 238–250.
Iversen, I. H. (1981). Response interactions with signaled delay of reinforcement.Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 3–9.
Karpicke, J., Christoph, G., Peterson, G., &Hearst, E. (1977). Signal location and positive versus negative conditioned suppression in the rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 105–118.
Pearce, J. M., &Hall, G. (1978). Overshadowing the instrumental conditioning of a lever-press response by a more valid predictor of the reinforcer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,4, 356–367.
Roberts, J. E., Tarpy, R. M., &Lea, S. E. G. (1984). Stimulus-response overshadowing: Effects of signaled reward on instrumental responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 244–255.
Schwartz, B. (1973). Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentations: The role of the modality of the signal for food.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,20, 17–22.
St. Claire-Smith, R. (1979). The overshadowing of instrumental conditioning by a stimulus that predicts reinforcement better than the response.Animal Learning & Behavior,7, 224–228.
Tarpy, R. M., Lea, S. E. G., &Midgley, M. (1983). The role of response-US correlation in stimulus-response overshadowing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35B, 53–65.
Tarpy, R. M., Roberts, J. E., Lea, S. E. G., &Midgley, M. (1984). The stimulus-response overshadowing phenomenon with VI versus FI schedules of reinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior,12, 50–54.
Wasserman, E. A., Franklin, S. R., &Hearst, E. (1974). Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology,86, 616–627.
Williams, B. A. (1978). Information effects on the response-reinforcer association.Animal Learning & Behavior,6, 371–379.
Williams, B. A., &Heyneman, N. (1982). Multiple determinants of “blocking” effects on operant behavior.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 72–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, J.E., Tarpy, R.M. & Cooney, N. The effects of signaled reward on sign tracking and response rate. Animal Learning & Behavior 13, 13–17 (1985). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213359
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213359