Abstract
It is argued that adherence of the results of experiments in the recognition failure paradigm to the function observed by Tulving and Wiseman (1975) reflects the operation of two distinct processes in recognition similar to those described by Mandler (1979, 1980). Familiarity decisions based on the target word alone can occur when target and list cue have not been integrated and result in some measure of dependence between recall and recognition. Contextual retrieval can operate in recognition when integration has occurred, and is independent of success in recall. It is further contended that deviations from the Tulving-Wiseman function arise because special instructions given to subjects produce more or less cue-target integration than is normal, and differentially affect the relative proportion of items recognized via contextual retrieval and via familiarity decisions. The first part of the paper argues that the contextual retrieval involved in recognition failure experiments takes the form of an attempted backward recall of the list cue from the target, consistent with the suggestions of Rabinowitz, Mandler, and Barsalou (1977) and claims that the results of a paper by Fisher (1979) strongly support this view.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection.Psychological Review,89, 708–729.
Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Broader methods and narrower theories for memory research. In L. S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Begg, I. (1979). Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words.Memory & Cognition,7, 113–123.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fisher, R. P. (1979). Retrieval operations in cued recall and recognition.Memory & Cognition,7, 224–231.
Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review,85, 153–171.
Gardiner, J. M., &Tulving, E. (1980). Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,19, 194–209.
Hanley, J. R., & Hindhaugh, J. (1982, December).The relationship between retrieval asymmetry and recognition failure. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society London Conference, University of London Institute of Education, London, England.
Horowitz, L. M., &Prytulak, L. S. (1969). Redintegrative memory.Psychological Review,76, 519–531.
Jones, G. V. (1978). Recognition failure and dual mechanisms in recall.Psychological Review,85, 464–469.
Kintsch, W. (1970). Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. NewYork: Academic Press.
Mandler, G. (1979). Organization and repetition: An extension of organizational principles with special reference to rote learning. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,98, 252–271.
Nairne, J. S. (1983). Associative processing during rote rehearsal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,9, 3–20.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Mandler, G., &Barsalow, L. W. (1977). Recognition failure: Another case of retrieval failure.Journal of verbal Learning and verbal Behavior,16, 639–663.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Mandler, G., &Patterson, K. E. (1977). Determinants of recognition and recall: Accessibility and generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 302–329.
Roediger, H. L., &Adelson, B. (1980). Semantic specificity in cued recall.Memory & Cognition,8, 65–74.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 79–82.
Watkins, M. J., &Tulving, E. (1975). Episodic memory: When recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,103, 5–29.
Wiseman, S., &Tulving, E., (1976). Encoding specificity: Relation between recall superiority and recognition failure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,2, 349–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richard Hanley, J. Duaal processes in recognition and in recognition failure. Memory & Cognition 12, 575–580 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213346
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213346