Abstract
We quantified the ability of human subjects to discriminate the relative distance of two points from a slanted plane when viewing the projected velocities of this scene (orthographic projection). The relative distance from a plane (called relief) is a 3-D property that is invariant under linear (affine) transformations. As such, relief canin principle be extracted from the instantaneous projected velocity field; a metric representation, which requires the extraction of visual acceleration, is not required. The stimulus consisted of a slanted planeP (specified by three points) and two pointsQ 1 andQ 2 that are non-coplanar withP. This configuration of points oscillated rigidly around the vertical axis. We have measured thesystematic error andaccuracy with which human subjects estimate the relative distance of pointsQ 1 andQ 2 from planeP as a function of the slant ofP. The systematic error varies with slant: it is low for small slant values, reaches a maximum for medium slant values, and drops again for high slant values. The accuracy covaries with the systematic error and is thus high for small and large slant values and low for medium slant values. These results are successfully modeled by a simple relief-from-motion computation based on local estimates of projected velocities. The data are well predicted by assuming (1) a measurement error in velocity estimation that varies proportionally to velocity (Weber’s law) and (2) an eccentricity-dependent underestimation of velocity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braunstein, M. L., Hoffman, D. D., &Pollick, F. E. (1990). Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 205–214.
Johnston, A., &Wright, M. J. (1986). Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision.Vision Research,26, 1099–1109.
Kaiser, M. K., &Calderone, J. B. (1991). Factors influencing perceived angular velocity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 428–434.
Kanatani, K. (1993). Unbiased estimation and statistical analysis of 3-D rigid motion from two views.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence,15, 37–50.
Koenderink, J. J., &van Doorn, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,8, 377–385.
McKee, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.Vision Research,21, 491–500.
Norman, J. F., &Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 279–291.
Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., &Phillips, F. (1994). The perception of 3-D structure from multiple sources of optical information.Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science,35, 1742.
Orban, G. A., van Calenbergh, F., de Bruyn, B., &Maes, H. (1985). Velocity discrimination in central and peripheral visual field.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 1836–1847.
Rubin, N., Solomon, S., &Hochstein, S. (1995). Restricted ability to recover 3D global motion from 1D local signals: Theoretical observations.Vision Research,35, 569–570.
Snippe, H. P., &Werkhoven, P. (1993). Pulse modulation detection in human motion vision.Vision Research,33, 647–656.
Snowden, R. J., &Braddick, O. J. (1991). The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals.Vision Research,31, 907–914.
Todd, J. T., Akerstrom, R. A., Reichel, F. D., &Hayes, W. (1988). Apparent rotation in three-dimensional space: Effects of temporal, spatial, and structural factors.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 179–188.
Todd, J. T., &Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 419–430.
Todd, J. T., &Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 509–523.
Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., Perotti, V. J., &Tittle, J. T. (1993). The discrimination of 3D length from motion and stereopsis.Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science,34, 1131.
Ullman, S. (1979).The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wagemans, J., van Gool, L., de Troy, A., Foster, D. H., &Wood, J. R. (1993). Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence.Perception,22, 107.
Werkhoven, P., &Koenderink, J. J. (1991). Visual processing of rotary motion.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 73–82.
Werkhoven, P., &Koenderink, J. J. (1993). Visual size invariance does not apply to geometric angle and vorticity.Perception,22, 177–184.
Werkhoven, P., Snippe, H. P., &Toet, A. (1992). Visual processing of optic acceleration.Vision Research,32, 2313–2329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present research was undertaken at the Buys Ballot Laboratory of the Utrecht Biophysics research institute, Utrecht University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werkhoven, P., van Veen, H.A.H.C. Extraction of relief from visual motion. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 645–656 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213270
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213270