Abstract
A reversal-shift paradigm was used to study the effects of dimensional labeling on the performance of 270 kindergarten children. Task 1 was a simultaneous discrimination problem in which form, size, and color were redundant relevant dimensions, In the shift task, one of the dimensions remained relevant with reward contingencies reversed, and the other two dimensions were made irrelevant. In both tasks, the children named the stimulus object to be chosen, prior to choosing, in terms of one of the three sets of dimensionnal values. Shift performance was predicted to be superior in groups required to name relevant dimensional values in comparison with groups required to name irrelevant dimensional values. Moreover shift performance was predicted to differ, within groups, for four different types of stimulus settings. Fmally, differences in performance on the settings were predicted to be larger for the irrelevant-labeling groups than for the relevant-labelmg groups. The results were found to be in good agreement with these predictions. The findings were discussed in relation to the subproblem analysis proposed by Tighe and Tighe (1972).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Guldmann, H.The effects o.f dimensional verbalization upon children’s per~brmance on reversal and extradimensional sh(tt discrimination problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1972.
References
Kendler, H. H., &Kendler, T. S. Effect of verbalization on reversal shifts in children.Science, 1961,134, 1619–1620.
Kendler, H. H., &Kendler, T. S. Mediation and conceptual behavior. In r. T. Spence (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968. Pp. 197–244.
Kendler, T. S. Verbalization and optional reversal shifts among kindergarten children.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 428–436.
Kendler, T. S. The effect of training and stimulus variables on the reversal-shift ontogeny.Journal 01 Experimental Child Psychology, 1974,17, 87–106.
Kendler, T. S., &Kendler, H. H. An ontogeny of optional shift behavior.Child Development, 1970,41, 1–28.
Kobayashi, E. L., &Cantor, J. H. The effects of dimensional naming upon children’s performance in a modified optional shift problem.Memory & Cogntnon, 1974,2, 401–405.
Shepp, B. E., &Turrisi, F. D. Learning and transfer of mediating responses in discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1966. pp. 86–120.
Silverman, I. W. Effect of verbalization on reversal sh ifts in children: Additional data.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966,4, 1–8.
Spence, K. W. The nature of discrimination learning in animals.Psychological Review, 1936,43, 427–449.
Spiker, C. C. An extension of Hull-Spence discrimination learning theory.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 496–515.
Spiker, C. C. Application of Hull-Spence theory to the discrimination learning of children. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1971. Pp. 99–152.
Spiker, C. C., &Cantor, J. H. Applications of Hull-Spence theory to the transfer of discrimination learning in children. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances In child development and behavior (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press. 1973. pp. 213–288.
Tighe, L. S., &Tighe, T. J. Transfer from perceptual pretraining as a function of number of task dimensions.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1969,8, 494–502.
Tighe, T. J. Subproblem analysis of discrimination learning. In G, H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Tighe, T. J., &Tighe, L. S. Stimulus control In children’s learning. In A. D. Pick (Ed.),Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol. 6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1972. pp. 128–157.
Zeaman, D., &House, B. J. The role of attention In retardate discrimination learning. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),Handbook of mental deficiency. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. pp. 159–223.
Zeaman, D., &House, B. J. Interpretations of developmental trends In discriminative transfer effects. In A. D. Pick (Ed.),Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol. 8). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1974. pp. 144–186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this report was supported by Grant BMS75-04334 from the National Science Foundation. The writers are indebted to Aletha Crowder, Adele Misurella, Paul Robinson, and Gerry Taylor for assistance in collecting and tabulating data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cantor, J.H., Spiker, C.C. The effects of labeling dimensional values on setting differences in shift performance of kindergarten children. Memory & Cognition 4, 446–452 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213201
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213201