Skip to main content
Download PDF

Semantic processing and organization in free recall

Memory & Cognition volume 4, pages 415–421 (1976)Cite this article

Abstract

It was hypothesized that both semantic processing and organizational activity are necessary for optimal free recall performance. In a series of three experiments, subjects were presented with a list of randomly selected nouns and were asked to make up a meaningful sentence for each noun. The subjects also rated the difficulty of using each noun. The subjects were instructed to try to remember words that were labeled “remember” words. For words that were labeled “story” words, the subjects were instructed only to make each sentence, using the word, part of an ongoing story which each subject was to make up. A test of retention for all presented words, using retention intervals of both 1 min and 24 h, showed that the story words were always recalled better than were the remember words. However, the amount of sequential organization was the same for both the story and the remember words. Recognition performance was found to be the same for both types of words. In addition, the story words were rated as being more difficult than the remember words. It was concluded that extensive semantic processing without organization is not sufficient for optimal recall

References

  • Banks, W. P. Signal detection theory and human memory.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. Organizational factors in memory.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 18–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. A selective review of organizational factors in memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organizatton ot’Memor3,. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H.. &Clark, M. C. Narrative stories as mediators tbr serial learning.Psychonomic Science, 1969,14, 181–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M. A “levels of analysis” view of memory. In P. Phner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.).Communicatton and affect Language and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework tor memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covitz, H. F.Galton’s walk. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J., &Kayfnas, R. A. Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially orgamzed verbal material.Journal ot Experimental Psychology, 1957,54, 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagle, M., &Leiter, E. Recall and recognition in intentional and incidental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, T. S. Dttferenttal etfects of effort and type of orienting task on recall and organization of highly associated words.Journal ol Experimental Psychology, 1973,97. 111–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, T. S., &Jenkins, J. J. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words.Journal o.! Experimental Psychology, 1969,82, 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it!American Psychologist, 1974,29, 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The ps.vchology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Association and organization: Facts, fancies, and theories. In T. R. Dtxon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavtor and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs. N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Words, lists, and categories: An experimental view of organized memory. In J. L. Cowan (Ed.),Studies in thought and language. Tucson, Ariz: University of Arizona Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Organizatton and recognition. In E. Tulving & W Donaldson (Eds.).Organization of memory New York: Academic Press. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNemar, Q.Psychologtcal statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milier, G. A., Galanter, E., &Pribram, K. H.Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Monograph Supplement, 1968, 76(1, Pt. 2).

  • Postman, L. Short-term memory and incidental learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.),Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L. Inhibiting effects of recall.Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slamecka, N. J. An examination of trace storage in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,76, 504–513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Till, R. E., &Jenkins, J. J. The effects of cued orienting tasks on the free recall of words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Subjective organization in free recall of “unrelated words.”Psychological Review, 1962,69, 344–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Theoretical issues in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., &Pearlstone, Z. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D. A., &Jenkins, J. J. Effects of orienting tasks on free recall in incidental learning: “Difficulty,” “effort,” and “process” explanations.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 481–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ohio University, 45701, Athens, Ohio

    Francis S. Bellezza, Deborah L. Richards & Ralph E. Geiselman

Authors
  1. Francis S. Bellezza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deborah L. Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralph E. Geiselman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellezza, F.S., Richards, D.L. & Geiselman, R.E. Semantic processing and organization in free recall. Memory & Cognition 4, 415–421 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213198

Keywords

  • Free Recall
  • Retention Interval
  • Serial Position
  • Semantic Processing
  • Incidental Learning