Abstract
The degree to which rats and monkeys base their discriminations of complex auditory stimuli (“tunes”) on frequency contours rather than on local features was investigated. In Experiment 1, groups of rats and monkeys trained with tunes as S+ and S− acquired a simple operant discrimination no faster than groups that received the same notes of each tune but in a new random order on each trial; neither did the groups differ on two transfer tests devised to detect learning of frequency contour in the tune-trained animals. Acquisition in the tune-trained and random-notes groups seemed to be based on the overall frequency difference between S+ and S−, which was about 1.5 octaves. In Experiment 2, S+ and S− were similar to each other with regard to overall frequency and individual notes, the most salient differentiating characteristic of the tunes being their tonal pattern. The tune-trained groups were clearly superior to the random-notes animals in acquisition, and an initial transfer test suggested that the former might have learned the discrimination on the basis of frequency contour. However, the detailed transfer tests of Experiment 3 strongly suggested that the tune-trained rats and monkeys based their discriminations primarily on local cues rather than on frequency contour. Based on the results of Experiment 4, the data of an earlier study that suggested frequency contour learning in monkeys and rats were reinterpreted in terms of control by local cues.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beecher, M. D., Petersen, M. R., Zoloth, S. R., Moody, D. B., &Stebbins, W. C. (1979). Perception of conspecific vocalizations by Japanese macaques: Evidence for selective attention and neural lateralization.Brain, Behavior and Evolution,16, 443–460.
Blackwell, H. R., &Schlosberg, H. (1943). Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology,33, 407–419.
Brooks, R. J., &Falls, J. B. (1975). Individual recognition by song in white-throated sparrows. III. Song features used in individual recognition.Canadian Journal of Zoology,53, 1749–1761.
Cowey, A. (1968). Discrimination. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.),Analysis of behavioral change. New York: Harper & Row.
D’Amato, M. R. (1973). Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.
D’Amato, M. R., &Salmon, D. P. (1982). Tune discrimination in monkeys (Cebus apella) and in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 126–134.
Dewson, J. H., III. (1979). Toward an animal model of auditory cognitive function. In C. L. Ludlow & M. E. Doran-Quine (Eds.),The neurological bases of language disorders in children: Methods and directions for research (NINCDS Monograph No. 22). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Dewson, J. H., Pribram, K. H., &Lynch, J. C. (1969). Effects of temporal cortex ablation upon speech sound discrimination in the monkey.Experimental Neurology,24, 579–591.
Glass, I., &Wollberg, Z. (1983). Auditory cortex responses to sequences of normal and reversed squirrel monkey vocalizations.Brain, Behavior and Evolution,22, 13–21.
Herman, L. M. (1980). Cognitive characteristics of dolphins. In L. M. Herman (Ed.),Cetacean behavior: Mechanisms and functions. New York: Wiley.
Herman, L. M., Richards, D. G., & Wolz, J. P. (in press). Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins.Cognition.
Hulse, S. H., Cynx, J., &Humpal, J. (1984). Cognitive processing of pitch and rhythm structures by birds. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marler, P. R. (1977). The structure of animal communication sounds. In T. H. Bullock (Ed.),Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Berlin: Abakon.
Marler, P. (1983). Monkey calls: How are they perceived and what do they mean? In J. F. Eisenberg & D. G. Kleiman (Eds.),Advances in the study of mammalian behavior. (Special publication No. 7). Shippensburg, PA: American Society of Mammalogists.
Miller, J. D. (1977). Perception of speech sounds by animals: Evidence for speech processing by mammalian auditory mechanisms. In T. H. Bullock (Ed.),Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Berlin: Abakon.
Papousek, M., &Papousek, H. (1981). Musical elements in the infant’s vocalization: Their significance for communication, cognition, and creativity. In L. P. Lipsitt (Ed.),Advances in infancy research (Vol. 1). Norwook, NJ: Ablex.
Robinson, J. G. (1979). An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey (Callicebus moloch).Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,49, 381–405.
Robinson, J. G. (in press). Syntactic structures in the vocalizations of wedge capped capuchin monkeys (Cebus nigrivittatus). Behaviour.
Sales, G., &Pye, D. (1974).Ultrasonic communication by animals. London: Chapman & Hall.
Segal, M., &Harrison, J. M. (1978). The control of responding by auditory stimuli: Interactions between different dimensions of the stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 97–106.
Shepherd, W. T. (1911). The discrimination of articulate sounds by raccoons.American Journal of Psychology,22, 116–119.
Shepherd, W. T. (1912). The discrimination of articulate sounds by cats.American Journal of Psychology,23, 461–463.
Snowdon, C. T. (1983). Ethology, comparative psychology, and animal behavior.Annual Review of Psychology,34, 63–94.
Thompson, R. K. R. (1980, July).Auditory cued reversal and matching-to-sample learning by rhesus monkeys. Paper presented at the Eighth International Congress of Primatology, Florence, Italy.
Thompson, R. K. R. (1981, October).Nonconceptual auditory matching by a rhesus monkey reflects biological constraints on cognitive processes? Paper presented at the Northeastern Meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, Kingston, Ontario.
Trehub, S. E., Bull, D. & Thorpe, L. A. (in press). Infants’ perception of melodies: The role of melodic contour.Child Development.
Wegener, J. G. (1964). Auditory discrimination behavior of normal monkeys.Journal of Auditory Research,4, 81–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS-8207146.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Amato, M.R., Salmon, D.P. Processing of complex auditory stimuli (tunes) by rats and monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Learning & Behavior 12, 184–194 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213141
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213141