Abstract
Goldfish, trained in the shuttlebox to avoid shock, were tested for the acquisition and extinction of a color-matching or a color-oddity conditional discrimination choice response, and then tested for reacquisition. Extinction affected the accuracy of the choice response but not the number of trials with response (response strength). Half of all groups were extinguished with changed signal colors, and half had the same signal colors experienced in acquisition. All groups had the same signal colors in reacquisition that they had experienced in acquisition. Changed-signal oddity groups decremented slightly faster than same-signal oddity groups, providing some support for a generalization decrement interpretation, but same- and changed-signal matching groups did not differ. All groups extinguished on the choice response by the end of extinction. All matching groups, and all oddity groups, regardless of their respective signal colors in extinction, reacquired at the same rate, and faster than in acquisition. These results imply conceptual generalization of extinction effects. Matching-trained groups were found to be slightly superior to oddity-trained groups in both acquisition and reacquisition. Comparisons of these results to positive reinforcement conditional discrimination extinction work, including some procedural suggestions, are made.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bolles, R. C., Moot, S. A., &Grossen, N. E. (1971). The extinction of shuttlebox avoidance.Learning and Motivation,2, 324–333.
Cohen, L. R. (1969). Generalization during acquisition, extinction, and transfer of matching with an adjustable comparison.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,12, 463–474.
Cumming, W. W., Berryman, R., Cohen, L. R., &Lanson, R. N. (1967). Some observations on extinction of a complex discriminated operant.Psychological Reports,20, 1328–1330.
Davenport, D. E., &Olson, R. D. (1968). A reinterpretation of extinction in discriminated avoidance.Psychonomic Science,13, 5–6.
Looney, T. A., Cohen, L. R., Brady, J. H., &Cohen, P. S. (1977). Conditional discrimination performance by pigeons on a response-independent procedure.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,27, 363–370.
Lydersen, T., &Cheney, C. D. (1973). Fixed-ratio discrimination effects of extinction and satiation.Journal of Biological Psychology,15, 26–29.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1974).The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 393–398.
Zentall, T. R., &Hogan, E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instance and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,30, 177–186.
Zerbolio, D. J., &Royalty, J. L. (1982). Acquisition and extinction of differential responses to signals paired with shock or shock-omission in goldfish: Evidence for truly discriminated avoidance learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 377–389.
Zerbolio, D. J., &Royalty, J. L. (1983). Matching and oddity conditional discrimination in the goldfish as avoidance responses: Evidence for conceptual avoidance learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 341–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zerbolio, D.J. Acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition of a conditional discrimination to avoid shock by goldfish. Animal Learning & Behavior 12, 163–170 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213136
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213136