Abstract
In the present study, an accuracy, rather than a reaction time, version of the Garner paradigm was used to evaluate the integrality or separability of major chord components. Tuned (prototype, or P) and mistuned (nonprototype, or NP) sets of root position C-major triads were constructed by holding the C constant in all stimuli and varying the E and G frequencies in 2- and 4-Hz steps. The P stimuli represent small systematic mistunings in the E and G notes relative to an equal-tempered C-major chord. The NP stimuli represent an equivalent range of frequency variation, but relative to a significantly out-of-tune C-major triad. In different experimental sessions, asame-different (AX) task was used to separately evaluate discrimination performance for the E and G frequencies as a function of whether the nontarget frequency (G or E) was fixed or varied in either a correlated or an orthogonal fashion (with the C frequency always held constant). Compared with a fixed baseline condition where only the target frequency changed, both chord components exhibited a significant redundancy gain in the correlated conditions and, to varying degrees, significant interference effects in the orthogonal condition, indicating that the chord components function largely in an integral fashion. Relative to the discrimination of G, discrimination of the E frequency was less influenced by variation in the nontarget (G) frequency, showing that attention, to some degree, could be selectively allocated to the E chord component. In addition, the results were consistent with previous findings that the functional prototype for the major chord category seems to act as a perceptual anchor, rather than as a magnet, and appears to be located in the physiologically defined area of just temperament, as opposed to the more experientially defined area ofequal temperament.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, B. E., &Pastore, R. E. (1995). The role of experience in the development of category structures [Abstract].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 3241.
Acker, B. E., Pastore, R. E., &Hall, M. D. (1995). Musical chord discrimination: Perceptual magnet or anchor?Perception & Psychophysics,57, 863–874.
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Burns, E. M., &Ward, W. I. (1978). Categorical perception— Phenomenon or epiphenomenon: Evidence from experiments in the perception of melodic musical intervals.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,63, 456–468.
Crowder, R. G. (1985). Perception of the major/minor distinction: II. Experimental investigations.Psychomusicology,5, 3–24.
Divenyi, P. L., &Hirsh, I. J. (1974). Identification of temporal order in three-tone sequences.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,56, 144–151.
Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review,85, 341–354.
Dowling, W. J., &Bartlett, J. C. (1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies.Psychomusicology,1, 30–49.
Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.Cognitive Psychology,8, 98–123.
Hirsch, I. J. (1959). Auditory perception of temporal order.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,31, 759–767.
Howard, D., Rosen, S., &Broad, V. (1992). Major/minor triad identification and discrimination by musically trained and untrained listeners.Music Perception,2, 205–220.
Iverson, P., &Kuhl, P. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,97, 553–562.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys.Psychological Review,89, 334–368.
Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 93–107.
Li, X., &Pastore, R. E. (1992). Evaluation of prototypes in perceptual space for a place contrast. In M. E. H. Schouten (Ed.),The auditory processing of speech (pp. 303–308). New York: De Gruyter.
Locke, S., &Kellar, I. (1973). Categorical perception in a nonlinguistic mode.Cortex,9, 355–369.
Loftus, G. R. (1993). Editorial comment.Memory & Cognition,21, 1–3.
Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Loosen, F. (1995). The effect of musical experience on the conception of accurate tuning.Music Perception,12, 291–306.
MacMillan, N. A., Braida, L. D., &Goldberg, R. F. (1987). Central and peripheral processes in the perception of speech and nonspeech sounds. In M. E. H. Schouten (Ed.),Psychophysics of speech perception (pp. 28–45). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof.
Massaro, D. W. (1987). Categorical partition: A fuzzy-logical model of categorization behavior. In S. Harnad (Ed.),Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 254–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J. L. (1977). Properties of feature detectors for VOT: The voiceless channel of analysis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 641–648.
Moran, H., &Pratt, C. C. (1926). Variability of judgments on musical intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology,9, 492–500.
Palmer, C., &Holleran, S. (1994). Harmonic, melodic, and frequency height influences on the perception of multivoiced music.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 301–312.
Pastore, R. E., Harris, L. B., &Kaplan, J. K. (1982). Temporal order identification: Some parameter dependencies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,71, 430–436.
Pastore, R. E., Schmuckler, M. A., Rosenblum, L., &Szczesiul, R. (1983). Duplex perception with musical stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 469–474.
Plomp, R., &Levelt, J. M. (1965). Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,38, 548–560.
Samuel, A. G. (1982). Phonetic prototypes.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 307–314.
Shepard, R. N. (1964). Circularity in judgments of relative pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 2346–2353.
Siegal, J. A., &Siegal, W. (1977). Categorical perception of tone intervals: Musicians can’t tell sharp from flat.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 399–407.
Studdert-Kennedy, M., Liberman, A. M., Harris, K.S., &Cooper, F. S. (1970). Motor theory of speech perception: A reply to Lane’s critical review.Psychological Review,77, 234–249.
Tanner, W. P. (1956). Theory of recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,28, 882–888.
Volaitis, L. E., &Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate in the internal structure of voicing categories.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,92, 723–735.
Winer, B. J. (1962).Statistical principles in experimental design (pp. 89-92). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant F4962093 and F49069310327 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the granting agency.Psychoacoustics and Auditory Cognition Laboratory,
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acker, B.E., Pastore, R.E. Perceptual integrality of major chord components. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 748–761 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213107
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213107