Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 324–333 | Cite as

Effects of inflation on the subjective value of delayed and probabilistic rewards

  • Pawel Ostaszewski
  • Leonard Green
  • Joel Myerson
Brief Reports

Abstract

In the years prior to 1994, there were very high rates of inflation in Poland, and the zloty depreciated relative to the U.S. dollar. However, the new zloty, introduced in 1995, was associated with greatly decreased rates of inflation and provided a more stable currency. We report a series of three experiments that take advantage of these changes to examine the effects of inflation on the subjective value of delayed and probabilistic rewards. Subjects were Polish citizens familiar with both zlotys and dollars. The first two experiments, conducted in 1994, used dollars and old zlotys, and the third experiment, conducted in 1996, used dollars and new zlotys. In all three experiments, the dollar and zloty rewards were of equivalent worth, according to the then current exchange rates. In Experiment 1, subjects chose between immediate and delayed rewards and, in Experiment 2, chose between certain and probabilistic rewards. The subjective value of a delayed reward was greater when its amount was specified in dollars than when it was specified in old zlotys. In contrast, the currency in which a reward was specified had no effect on the subjective value of probabilistic rewards. The results of these two experiments suggest a selective effect of inflation on decisions involving delayed rewards. This was verified in the third experiment, in which, using new zlotys, no differences in discounting were observed between the two currencies with either probabilistic or delayed rewards. Importantly, in all three experiments, the discounting of both delayed and probabilistic rewards was well described by the same simple mathematical model, suggesting that similar decision-making processes underlie both phenomena. However, the present results argue against a single-process theory in which the discounting of probabilistic rewards is derived from the discounting of delayed rewards.

Keywords

Inflation Rate Discount Function Future Reward Temporal Discount Probabilistic Reward 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allison, J. (1983).Behavioral economics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Gallant, A. R. (1987).Nonlinear statistical models. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Green, L., Fisher, E. B., Jr.,Perlow, S., &Sherman, L. (1981). Preference reversal and self-control: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay.Behaviour Analysis Letters,1, 43–51.Google Scholar
  4. Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, L., &Kagel, J. H. (Eds.) (1987).Advances in behavioral economics (Vol. 1). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  6. Green, L., &Kagel, J. H. (Eds.) (1990).Advances in behavioral economics (Vol.2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1996). Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time.American Zoologist,36, 496–505.Google Scholar
  8. Green, L., Myerson, J., &McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.Memory & Cognition,25, 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green, L.,Myerson, J., &Ostaszewski, P. (1997, May).Amount of reward has opposite effects on temporal and probability discounting. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Hausman, J. A. (1979). Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables.Bell Journal of Economics,10, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hursh, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,34, 219–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,42, 435–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. International Monetary Fund (1996).World economic outlook. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Kagel, J. H., Battalio, R. C., &Green, L. (1995).Economic choice theory: An experimental analysis of animal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirby, K. N. (1996). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirby, K. N., &Maraković, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,64, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirby, K. N., &Maraković, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lea, S. E. G., Tarpy, R. M., &Webley, P. (1987).The individual in the economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Myerson, J., &Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,64, 263–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Prelec, D., &Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach.Management Science,37, 770–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rachlin, H. (1989).Judgement, decision, and choice: A cognitive/ behavioral synthesis. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., &Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice.Psychological Review,93, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., &Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 233–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodriguez, M. L., &Logue, A. W. (1988). Adjusting delay to reinforcement: Comparing choice in pigeons and humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 105–117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Staddon, J. E. R. (Ed.) (1980).Limits to action: The allocation of individual behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency.Economics Letters,8, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pawel Ostaszewski
    • 1
  • Leonard Green
    • 2
  • Joel Myerson
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyWarsaw UniversityWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWashington UniversitySt. Louis

Personalised recommendations