Abstract
Three experiments examined retrieval in a cued recall paradigm by manipulating the pattern of output cues. In the first two experiments, subjects were paced through recall of a categorized list by recalling one word at a time in response to a category name as a retrieval cue. The pattern of these output cues exerted a strong influence on performance. Subjects recalled considerably more when the cues were blocked by category than when required to recall successive words from different categories. This output effect increased over trials, and was interpreted in terms of a model in which subjects develop a retrieval strategy that can be interfered with by the circumstances of output. The last experiment contrasted structural and strategy models in a hierarchical recall paradigm. Subjects were given a set of postinput recall cues that either made evident the hierarchical structure of the input list or contained the same cue words but with no hierarchical information. Information about the hierarchical structure improved performance even when provided only during recall. The data were discuss in terms of recent models of recall, and a compromise was suggested.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, John R. FRAN: A simulation model of free recall. In G. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Battig, W.F., & Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut Category Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969, 80, 1–46.
Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. M., & Winzenz, D. Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 323–343.
Hogan, R. M., & Kintsch, W. Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 562–567.
Santa, J. L., & Lamwers, L. L. Encoding specificity: Fact or antifact. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 412–423.
Shiffrin, R. M. Memory Search, in D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Slamecka, N. J. An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, 504–513.
Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970, 86, 255–262.
ba]Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Tulving, E., & Osier, S. Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 593–601.
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 381–391.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 87, 116–124.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 352–373.
Wood, G. Category names as cues for the recall of category instances. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, 323–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was in part supported by Biomedical and Research Council grants to the first author. The last experiment was conducted while the first author was on an NIMH postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santa, J.L., Ruskin, A.B., Snuttjer, D. et al. Retrieval in cued recall. Memory & Cognition 3, 341–348 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212922
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212922