Abstract
One hundred and forty-eight undergraduate women were orally instructed to repeatedly and quickly draw circles in spatial relation to squares printed on sheets of paper. On each trial, the instructions required the circle to be drawn either above, below, to the right of, or to the left of the square. The instructions were expressed so that the circle was either the logical subject (e.g., “circle above square”) or the logical object (e.g., “square below circle”) of the statement. Each subject received all experimental conditions for a total of 24 separate drawings per subject. Analysis of variance of the total number of errors disclosed significant effects of all experimental variables. Performance was significantly more accurate when the circle was the logical subject, when the orientations were “above” and “right of” rather than “below” and “left of” and for the vertical dimension. The results are discussed in terms of current theories on “asymmetries” in information processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference
Benton, A. L.Right-left discrimination and finger localization. New York: Hoeber-Harper, 1969.
Corballis, M., & Beale, I. Bilateral symmetry and behavior. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 451–464.
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 472–517.
Harris, L. J. Discrimination of left and right and development of the logic of relations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1 972, 18 , 307–320.
Hécaen, H., & de Ajuriaguerra, J.Left-Handedness: Manual superiority and cerebral dominance. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964.
Howard, I., & Templeton, W.Human Spatial Orientation. London: Wiley, 1966.
Huttenlocher, J., & Strauss, S. Comprehension and a statement’s relation to the situation it describes. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968, 7, 527–530.
Olson, G. M., & Laxar, K. Asymmetries in processing the terms “right” and “left.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 100, 284–290.
Olson, G. M., & Laxar, K. Processing the terms “right” and “left”: A note on left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102 , 1135–1137.
Rubel, R., & Teuber, H. L. Discrimination of direction of line in children. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, 56, 892–898.
Sutherland, N. Visual discrimination of orientation and shape by the octopus. Nature, 1957, 179, 11–13.
Tschirgi, R. Spatial perception and central nervous system symmetry. Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatria, 1958, 16, 364–366. Cited by A. Scheibel, and M. Scheibel, in V. Mountcastle, (Ed.),Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1962. Pp. 29–30.
Werner, H.Comparative psychology of mental development. (Rev. Ed.) New York: Science Editions, 1961.
Zangwill, O. W. Cerebral dominance and its relation to psychological function. London: Oliver & Boyd, 1960.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, L.J. Spatial direction and grammatical form of instructions affect the solution of spatial problems. Memory & Cognition 3, 329–334 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212920
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212920