Abstract
The encoding of either physical or semantic features of words was biased in an intentional learning situation. A modified recognition test was then employed to assess the effectiveness of this study manipulation and its consequences for retention. The Ss were required to select test items that were either physically similar, semantically similar, or identical to a study word. Results revealed that Ss biased toward physical encoding were more successful in selecting physically similar than semantically similar test items, while the opposite was true of Ss biased toward semantic encoding. The Ss in the two study conditions did not differ in their ability to select test items that were identical to a study word. This pattern of results was interpreted as evidence that semantic and physical information can be equally well retained over the long term. Limits on the generality of prior findings of rapid decay for physical information are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80 (3, Part 2).
Begg, I., & Palvio, A. Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 821–827.
Craik, F. I. M. A “levels of analysis” view of memory. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, and T. M. Alloway (Eds.),Communication and affect: Language and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Ekstrand, B. R., Wallace, W. P., & Underwood, B. J. A frequency theory of verbal-discrimination learning. Psychological Rewew, 1966, 73, 566–578.
Elias, C. S., & Perfetti, C. A. Encoding task and recognition memory: The importance of semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 99, 151–156.
Jacoby, L. L., & Goolkasian, P. Semantic versus acoustic coding: Retention and conditions of organization. Journal of Verbal Learning& Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 324–333.
Kolers, P. K. Remember operations. Memory& Cognition, 1973, 1, 347–355.
Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobell, L. Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning& Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 1–11.
Sachs, J. S. Recognition memory for sytactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception& Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 437–442.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. W. Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 87, 116–125.
Underwood, B. J. Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 559–573.
Walter, D. A. The effect of sentence context on the stability of phonemic and semantic memory dimensions. Journal of Verbal Learning& Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12,185–192.
Wickens, D. D. Encoding categories or words: Am empirical approach to meaning, Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article was prepared while the author was on leave visiting the University of Toronto. The author expresses his appreciation to F. I. M. Craik, Zita M. Sirautis, and a consulting editor who remains anonymous for their helpful comments concerned with the writing of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacoby, L.L. Physical features vs meaning: A difference in decay. Memory & Cognition 3, 247–251 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212906
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212906