Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 69–72 | Cite as

Water taste in man

  • Linda M. Bartoshuk
Article

Abstract

Taste quality and intensity shifts following adaptation to NaCl, quinine hydrochloride, sucrose and HCl were investigated in 10 Ss. In each of four sessions, Ss were adapted to water and two concentrations of one taste solution and gave magnitude estimates and quality judgments for a series of concentrations of that solution. Adapting to water produced magnitude estimates which increased with increasing concentration. Quality judgments were typical, e.g., “salty” for NaCl. Adapting to moderate concentrations of taste solutions generally produced magnitude estimates of zero at the adapting concentrations and increasing values for higher and lower (sub-adapting) concentrations. Sub-adapting tastes were atypical. Adaptation to NaCl and sucrose produced bitter sub-adapting tastes and adaptation to HCl and quinine hydrochloride produced sweet sub-adapting tastes. Water, as the lowest sub-adapting “concentration”, produced the largest sub-adapting tastes.

Keywords

Test Stimulus Taste Quality Taste Stimulus Sour Taste Quality Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abrahams, H., Krakauer, D., &Dallenbach, K. M. Gustatory adaptation to salt.Amer. J. Psychol., 1937, 49, 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. J. The taste of water.Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 462–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartoshuk, Linda M. Effects of adaptation on responses to water in cat and rat. (Doctoral dissertation, Brown University) Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, 1965, No. 65-13, 630.Google Scholar
  4. Bartoshuk, Linda M., McBurney, D. H., &Pfaffmann, C. Taste of sodium chloride solutions after adaptation to sodium chloride: implications for the “water taste”.Science, 1964, 143, 967–968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartoshuk, Linda M., &Pfaffmann, C. Effects of pre-treatment on the water taste response in cat and rat.Fed. Proc, 1965, 24, 207, Abstract no. 441.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W. The judgment of very weak sensory stimuli.U. of Calif. Publications in Psychol., 1914, 1, 1966–268.Google Scholar
  7. Bujas, Z. Beobachtungen über den Restitutionsvorgang beim Geschmackssinn.Acta Inst. Psychol., Univ. Zagreb, 1939, 3, 3–14.Google Scholar
  8. Camerer, W. Ueber die Abhangigkeit des Geschmackssinns von der gereizten Stelle der Mundhöhle.Z. Biol., 1870, 6, 440–452.Google Scholar
  9. Hahn, H. Die Adaptation des Geschmackssinnes.Z. Sinnesphysiol., 1934, 65, 8–145.Google Scholar
  10. Haller, A. Von.First lines of physiology. Tr. from 3rd Latin ed., Primae lineae physiologiae; 1st ed., 1747. Philadelphia: Obadiah Penniman and Co., 1803.Google Scholar
  11. Henle, J. Ueber den Geschmackssinn.Anthropologische Vorträge, 1880, 2, 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Kahlenberg, L. The action of solutions on the sense of taste.Bull. U. Wis. Sci. Series, 1898, 2, 1–31.Google Scholar
  13. Keidel, W. D., Keidel, U. O., &Wigand, M. E. Adaptation: loss or gain of sensory information? In W. A. Rosenblith (Ed.),Sensory communication. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  14. Kiesow, F. Beiträge zur physiologischen Psychologie des Geschmackssinnes.Philosophische Studien, 1894, 10, 523–561.Google Scholar
  15. Krakauer, D., &Dallenbach, K. M. Gustatory adaptation to sweet, sour and bitter.Amer. J. Psychol., 1937, 49, 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luciani, L.Human physiology. Tr. F. A. Welby. London: Macmillan and Co., 1917.Google Scholar
  17. Mayer, B. Messende Untersuchungen über die Unstimmung des Geschmackswerkzeugs.Z. Sinnesphysiol., 1927, 58, 133–152.Google Scholar
  18. McBurney, D. H. Magnitude estimation of the taste of sodium chloride after adaptation to sodium chloride.J. exp. Psychol., 1966, 72, 869–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagel, W. A. Über die Wirkung des Chlorsauren Kali auf den Geschmackssinn.Z. für Psychol. und Physiol, den Sinnesorgane, 1896, 10, 235–239.Google Scholar
  20. Öhrwall, H. Untersuchungen uber den Geschmackssinn.Skand. Arch. Physiol., 1891, 2, 1–69.Google Scholar
  21. Parker, G. H.Smell, taste and allied senses in the vertebrates. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1922.Google Scholar
  22. Richards, T. W. The relation of the taste of acids to their degree of dissociation.Amer. Chem. J., 1898, 20, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Von Skramlik, E.Handbuch der Physiologie der Niederen Sinne. Leipzig: Georg Thieme, 1926.Google Scholar
  24. Zotterman, Y. Species differences in the water taste.Acta Physiol. Scand., 1956, 37, 60–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zotterman, Y., &Diament, H. Has water a specific taste?Nature, 1959, 183, 191–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda M. Bartoshuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Pioneering Research LaboratoryU. S. Army Natick LaboratoriesNatick

Personalised recommendations