Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 8, Issue 5, pp 279–286 | Cite as

Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value

  • D. E. Berlyne
Article

Abstract

Two experiments, in which Ss were exposed to sequences of colored shapes, investigated effects on ratings of “pleasingness” and “interestingness” of variables that had previously been shown to affect ratings of “novelty.” The results indicate, on the whole, that both pleasingness and interestingness increase with novelty. These findings run counter to those of experiments indicating an inverse relation between novelty and verbally expressed preference. Two further experiments examined effects of some variables that might account for this apparent discrepancy. Homogeneous sequences declined in judged “pleasantness” more than sequences in which several stimuli were interspersed, and simple stimuli became less pleasant as they became less novel, while complex stimuli declined less or became more pleasant. The findings are related to hypotheses regarding mechanisms of hedonic value. Two crucial predictions were confirmed in a fifth experiment.

Keywords

Linear Component Complex Stimulus Sequence Class Simple Stimulus Heterogeneous Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. ALPERT, R. Perceptual determinants of affect. Unpublished MA thesis, Wesleyan University, 1953.Google Scholar
  2. BERLYNE, D. E.Conflict, arousal and curiosity, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BERLYNE, D. E. Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology-A study of a science. Vol.5. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963a. Pp. 284–364.Google Scholar
  4. BERLYNE, D. E. Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963b, 17, 274–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. BERLYNE, D. E. Curiosity and exploration. Science, 1966, 153, 25–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. BERLYNE, D. E. Arousal and reinforcement. In D. Levine (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1967, Lincoln, Nebr: University of Nebraska Press, 1967. Pp. 1–110.Google Scholar
  7. BERLYNE, D. E.Psychobiology and aesthetics. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, in press.Google Scholar
  8. BERLYNE, D. E., OGILVIE, J. C, & PARHAM, L. C. C. The dimensionality of visual complexity, interestingness and pleasingness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1968, 22, 376–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. BERLYNE, D. E., & PARHAM, L. C. C. Determinants of subjective novelty. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 415–423.Google Scholar
  10. CANTOR, G. N. Children’s “like-dislike” ratings of familiarized and unfamiliarized visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968, 6, 651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DAY, H. Exploratory behavior as a function of individual differences and level of arousal. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Toronto, 1965.Google Scholar
  12. DAY, H. Evaluations of subjective complexity, pleasingness and interestingness for a series of random polygons varying in complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DAY, H. The importance of symmetry and complexity in the evaluation of complexity, interest and pleasingness. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10, 339–340.Google Scholar
  14. FERGUSON, G. A.Nonparametric trend analysis. Montreal: McGill University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  15. MUNSINGER, H., & KESSEN, W. Uncertainty, structure and preference. Psychological Monographs, 1964, 78, No. 9.Google Scholar
  16. OSGOOD, C. E., SUCI, G. J., & TANNENBAUM, P. H.The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  17. SCHULTZ, D. P.Sensory restriction: Effects on Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  18. SKAIFE, A. M. The role of complexity and deviation in changing musical taste. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oregon, 1967.Google Scholar
  19. ZAJONC, R. B. Attftudmal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968, 9, No. 2, Part 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. E. Berlyne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations