Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article
Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Pressure and the ability to randomize decision-making: The case of the pickoff play in Major League Baseball

01 September 2019

Jim Downey & Joseph McGarrity

Are the advantages of chess expertise on visuo-spatial working-memory capacity domain specific or domain general?

14 June 2021

Evan T. Smith, James C. Bartlett, … Chandramallika Basak

Illusory checkmates: why chess is not a game

23 September 2022

Michael Hickson

Association and response accuracy in the wild

15 October 2018

Sudeep Bhatia & Lukasz Walasek

The Winning Ways of John Conway

22 May 2021

Madhavan Mukund

The joint contribution of participation and performance to learning functions: Exploring the effects of age in large-scale data sets

24 September 2018

Mark Steyvers & Aaron S. Benjamin

The strength of weak leaders: an experiment on social influence and social learning in teams

18 May 2019

Berno Buechel, Stefan Klößner, … Heiko Rauhut

Model of cognitive dynamics predicts performance on standardized tests

14 August 2018

Nathan O. Hodas, Jacob Hunter, … Kristina Lerman

Decision-making performance and self-generated knowledge in handball-defense patterns: a case of representational redescription

10 January 2023

Lukas Magnaguagno, Ernst-Joachim Hossner, … Stephan Zahno

Download PDF
  • Published: June 1996

Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill

  • Fernand Gobet1 &
  • Herbert A. Simon1 

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review volume 3, pages 159–163 (1996)Cite this article

  • 1598 Accesses

  • 110 Citations

  • Metrics details

Abstract

A widely cited result asserts that experts’ superiority over novices in recalling meaningful material from their domain of expertise vanishes when they are confronted with random material. A review of recent chess experiments in which random positions served as control material (presentation time between 3 and 10 sec) shows, however, that strong players generally maintain some superiority over weak players even with random positions, although the relative difference between skill levels is much smaller than with game positions. The implications of this finding for expertise in chess are discussed and the question of the recall of random material in other domains is raised.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Allard, F., Graham, S., &Paarsalu, M. E. (1980). Perception in sport: Basketball.Journal of Sport Psychology,2, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, F., &Starkes, J. L. (1991). Motor-skill experts in sports, dance and other domains. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.),Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 126–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990).Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1979). Components of skill in bridge.Canadian Journal of Psychology,33, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness, N. (1988). Expertise in chess, music and physics: A cognitive perspective. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.),The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., &Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 1–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973a). The mind’s eye in chess. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. (1973b). Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology,4, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J., Atlas, R. S., Lane, D. M., &Berger, R. C. (1993). Role of high-level knowledge in memory for chess positions.American Journal of Psychology,106, 321–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranberg, L. D., &Albert, M. L. (1988). The chess mind. In L. K. Obler & D. Fein (Eds.),The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 156–190). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. D. (1946).Het denken van den schaker. Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, A. D. (1978).Thought and choice in chess (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djakow, I. N., Petrowski, N. W., &Rudik, P. A. (1927).Psychologie des Schachspiels. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, D. E., &Schwartz, E. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory & Cognition,7, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., &Bukstel, L. (1978). Memory processes among bridge players of differing expertise.American Journal of Psychology,91, 673–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., &Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition.American Psychologist,49, 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, P. W., &Adesman, P. (1976). Recall memory for visually presented chess positions.Memory & Cognition,4, 541–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F. (1993).Les mémoires d’un joueur d’échecs. Fribourg, Switzerland: Editions Universitaires.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (1995).Role of presentation time in recall of game and random chess positions (Complex Information Paper No. 524). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (in press-a). Recall of random and distorted chess positions: Implications for the theory of expertise.Memory & Cognition.

  • Gobet, F., &Simon, H. A. (in press-b). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards.Cognitive Psychology.

  • Gold, A., &Opwis, K. (1992). Methoden zur empirischen Analyse von Chunks beim Reproduzieren von Schachstellungen.Sprache & Cognition,11, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, S. E. (1979). Recognition memory for chess positions: Some preliminary research.American Journal of Psychology,92, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H. (1985).The psychology of chess skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, D. H., &Reynolds, R. I. (1982). Recall or evaluation of chess positions as determinants of chess skill.Memory & Cognition,10, 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E., &Love, T. (1972). How good can memory be? In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory (pp. 237–268). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. W. (1968).Het oog van de meester. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. M., &Robertson, L. (1979). The generality of the levels of processing hypothesis: An application to memory for chess positions.Memory & Cognition,7, 253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. (1988). Problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.),The psychology of human thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lories, G. (1987). Recall of random and non random chess positions in strong and weak chess players.Psychologica Belgica,27, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeithen, K. B., Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. H., &Hirtle, S. C. (1981). Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers.Cognitive Psychology,13, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, J. S. (1976). Skilled perception in Go: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times.Cognitive Psychology,8, 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, R. I. (1982). Search heuristics of chess players of different calibers.American Journal of Psychology,95, 383–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1984).Coding problem spaces in chess: A psychological study (Commentationes Scientiarum Socialium 23). Turku, Finland: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1985). Chess players’ intake of task-relevant cues.Memory & Cognition,13, 385–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1989). Chess players’ recall of auditorily presented chess positions.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1991). Aspects of skilled imagery in blindfold chess.Acta Psychologica,77, 65–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saariluoma, P. (1994). Location coding in chess.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 607–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., &Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess.American Scientist,61, 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J. A. (1976). Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, K. J., &De Groot, A. D. (1990). The memory recall paradigm: Straightening out the historical record.American Psychologist,45, 285–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, A. S., Mitchell, D. H., &Frey, P. W. (1984). Perceptual skill in the game of Othello.Journal of Psychology,118, 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA

    Fernand Gobet & Herbert A. Simon

Authors
  1. Fernand Gobet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herbert A. Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert A. Simon.

Additional information

Preparation of this article was supported by Grant No. 8210-30606 from the Swiss National Funds of Scientific Research to F.G. and Grant No. DBS-912-1027 from the National Science Foundation to H.A.S. The authors extend their thanks to Neil Charness, David Lane, Howard Richman, Pertti Saariluoma, Jim Staszewski, and Shmuel Ur for valuable comments on parts of this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobet, F., Simon, H.A. Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 159–163 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212414

Download citation

  • Received: 12 July 1995

  • Accepted: 15 November 1995

  • Issue Date: June 1996

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212414

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Random Position
  • Chess Player
  • American Journal ofPsychology
  • Strong Player
  • Skill Difference
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.238.134.157

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.