This paper reports the first phase of a research program on visual perception of motion patterns characteristic of living organisms in locomotion. Such motion patterns in animals and men are termed here as biological motion. They are characterized by a far higher degree of complexity than the patterns of simple mechanical motions usually studied in our laboratories. In everyday perceptions, the visual information from biological motion and from the corresponding figurative contour patterns (the shape of the body) are intermingled. A method for studying information from the motion pattern per se without interference with the form aspect was devised. In short, the motion of the living body was represented by a few bright spots describing the motions of the main joints. It is found that 10–12 such elements in adequate motion combinations in proximal stimulus evoke a compelling impression of human walking, running, dancing, etc. The kinetic-geometric model for visual vector analysis originally developed in the study of perception of motion combinations of the mechanical type was applied to these biological motion patterns. The validity of this model in the present context was experimentally tested and the results turned out to be highly positive.
Borjesson, E., & von Hofsten, C. Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 263–268.
Borjesson, E. & von Hofsten, C. Visual perception of motion in depth Application of a vector model to three-dot motion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 169–179.
Cohen, R.Problems in motion perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1964
Duncker, K. Ueber induzierte Bewegung. Psychologische Forschung, 1929, 12.
Gibson, J. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton & Mifflin, 1966.
Green, B., Jr. Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 272–282.
Hochberg, J. E. Effects of the gestalt revolution: The Cornell Symposium on Perception. Psychological Review, 1957, 69, 2.
Johansson, G.Configurations in event perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1950.
Johansson, G. Rigidity, stability and motion in perceptual space. Acta Psychologica, 1958, 14, 359–370.
Johansson, G. Perception of motion and changing form. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1964, 5, 181–208.
Johansson, G. Geschehenswamehmung. Handbuch der Psychologie, 1966, Band 1, 745–775.
Johansson, G. Motion perception. A model for visual motion and space perception from changing proximal stimulation. Report No. 98, Department of Psychology. University of Uppsala, 1973. (Also Studia Psychologica, Bratislava, in press.)
Johansson, G., & Jansson, G. J. Perceived rotary motion from changes in a straight line. Perception & Psychophysics. 1968, 4, 165–170.
Marmolin, H , & Ulfberg, S. Motion perception and form change. Unpublished report, Uppsala University, 1967.
Michotte, A.The perception of causality. (Translation) London: Methuen, 1963.
Rubin, E. Visuelle wahrgenommenen wirklische Bewegungen. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 1927, 1, 103.
Wertheimer, M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 1923, 4, 301–350.
This research was supported by a grant from the Swedish Council for Social Science Research. Experimental assistance was provided by Ragnar Johansson.
About this article
Cite this article
Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 201–211 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212378
- Motion Pattern
- Motion Perception
- Vector Analysis
- Biological Motion
- Human Walking