Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 201–211 | Cite as

Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis

  • Gunnar Johansson
Article

Abstract

This paper reports the first phase of a research program on visual perception of motion patterns characteristic of living organisms in locomotion. Such motion patterns in animals and men are termed here as biological motion. They are characterized by a far higher degree of complexity than the patterns of simple mechanical motions usually studied in our laboratories. In everyday perceptions, the visual information from biological motion and from the corresponding figurative contour patterns (the shape of the body) are intermingled. A method for studying information from the motion pattern per se without interference with the form aspect was devised. In short, the motion of the living body was represented by a few bright spots describing the motions of the main joints. It is found that 10–12 such elements in adequate motion combinations in proximal stimulus evoke a compelling impression of human walking, running, dancing, etc. The kinetic-geometric model for visual vector analysis originally developed in the study of perception of motion combinations of the mechanical type was applied to these biological motion patterns. The validity of this model in the present context was experimentally tested and the results turned out to be highly positive.

References

  1. Borjesson, E., & von Hofsten, C. Spatial determinants of depth perception in two-dot motion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 11, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borjesson, E. & von Hofsten, C. Visual perception of motion in depth Application of a vector model to three-dot motion patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 169–179.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, R.Problems in motion perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1964Google Scholar
  4. Duncker, K. Ueber induzierte Bewegung. Psychologische Forschung, 1929, 12.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson, J. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. New York: Houghton & Mifflin, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. Green, B., Jr. Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 272–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hochberg, J. E. Effects of the gestalt revolution: The Cornell Symposium on Perception. Psychological Review, 1957, 69, 2.Google Scholar
  8. Johansson, G.Configurations in event perception. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1950.Google Scholar
  9. Johansson, G. Rigidity, stability and motion in perceptual space. Acta Psychologica, 1958, 14, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johansson, G. Perception of motion and changing form. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1964, 5, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johansson, G. Geschehenswamehmung. Handbuch der Psychologie, 1966, Band 1, 745–775.Google Scholar
  12. Johansson, G. Motion perception. A model for visual motion and space perception from changing proximal stimulation. Report No. 98, Department of Psychology. University of Uppsala, 1973. (Also Studia Psychologica, Bratislava, in press.)Google Scholar
  13. Johansson, G., & Jansson, G. J. Perceived rotary motion from changes in a straight line. Perception & Psychophysics. 1968, 4, 165–170.Google Scholar
  14. Marmolin, H , & Ulfberg, S. Motion perception and form change. Unpublished report, Uppsala University, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. Michotte, A.The perception of causality. (Translation) London: Methuen, 1963.Google Scholar
  16. Rubin, E. Visuelle wahrgenommenen wirklische Bewegungen. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 1927, 1, 103.Google Scholar
  17. Wertheimer, M. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. Psychologische Forschung, 1923, 4, 301–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunnar Johansson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UppsalaUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations