Abstract
The selective nocturnal persistence of death feigning, an antipredator behavior, was assessed in four studies involving single daily trials. In Experiments 1 and 2, White Leghorn chicks exhibited a progressive decline in death feigning durations in both the light and the dark phases of their photoperiods over 8 days, but resistance to habituation was greater at night. When nocturnal death feigning was induced to a habituation criterion (Experiment 3), it was extremely persistent and was not completely abolished in some chicks, even after 25 consecutive test days. Because nocturnal response durations of chicks tested cross-sectionally increased over the same developmental period (Experiment 4), a shifting developmental baseline was excluded as the basis for the declining response durations observed in the first three studies. The differential plasticity of death feigning at two times of day is consistent with the argument that predatorprey synchrony confers a selective advantage, and suggests an additional biological constraint on learning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Eyer, J. C.The effects of conspecific vocalizations and repeated testing on the duration of tonic immobility in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus). Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, May 1972.
Nestor, C.Malnutrition in chicks and its effect on incidental or advantageous learning. Senior honor’s thesis, Douglass College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., 1981.
References
Aschoff, J. Survival value of diurnal rhythms.Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 1964,13, 79–98.
Boice, R., &Williams, R. C. Delay in onset of tonic immobility inRana pipiens.Copeia, 1971,4, 747–748.
Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 32–48.
Bolles, R. C. The comparative psychology of learning: The selective association principle and some problems with “general” laws of learning. In G. Bermant (Ed.),Perspectives on animal behavior. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman, 1973.
Buss, A. H. Psychology: Man in perspective. New York: Wiley, 1973.
Curio, E. The ethology of predation. New York: Springer, 1976.
D’Amato, M. R., &Schiff, D. Long-term discriminated avoidance performance in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 123–126.
Edmunds, M. Defence in animals. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman Group, 1974.
Gallup, G. G., Jr. Animal hypnosis: Factual status of a fictional concept.Psychological Bulletin, 1974,81, 836–853. (a)
Gallup, G. G., Jr. Genetic influence on tonic immobility in chickens.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 145–147. (b)
Gallup, G. G., Jr. Tonic immobility: The role of fear and predation.Psychological Record, 1977,24, 41–61.
Gilman, T. T., Marcuse, F. L., &Moore, A. U. Animal hypnosis: A study in the induction of tonic immobility in chickens.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1950,43, 99–111.
Hennig, C. W., &Dunlap, W. P. Orcadian rhythms and the effect of lighting on tonic immobility in two species of lizards (Anolis carolinensis andHemidactylus turcicus).Behavioral Biology, 1977,20, 523–528.
Hinde, R. A. Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behavior of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). II. The waning of the response.Proceedings of the Royal Society (Series B), 1954,142, 306–341.
Hinde, R. A. Factors governing the changes in strength of a partially inborn response, as shown by the mobbing behavior of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs).Proceedings of the Royal Society (Series B), 1960,753, 398–420.
Hutchinson, G. F. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why there are so many kinds of animals.American Naturalist, 1959,93, 145–149.
Kare, M. R., &Rogers, J. G., Jr. Sense organs. In P. D. Sturkie (Ed.),Avian physiology (3rd ed.). New York: Springer, 1976.
Kavanau, J. L., &Ramos, J. Influences of light on activity and phasing of carnivores.American Naturalist, 1975,109, 391–418.
McKnight, R. R., Copperberg, G. F., &Ginter, E. J. Duration of tonic immobility in lizards (Anolis carolinensis) as a function of repeated immobilization, frequent handling, and laboratory maintenance.Psychological Record, 1978,28, 549–556.
Melzack, R. On survival of mallard ducks after “habituation” to the hawk-shaped figure.Behaviour, 1961,17, 9–16.
Melzack, R., Penick, E., &Beckett, A. The problem of “innate fear” of the hawk shape: An experimental study with mallard ducks.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959,52, 694–698.
Mueller, H. C. Reactions of quail to flying vultures.The Condor, 1976,78, 120–121.
Nash, R. F. Habituation and tonic immobility in chickens: Strain comparisons.The Psychological Record, 1978,28, 109–114.
Nash, R. F., &Gallup, G. G., Jr. Habituation and tonic immobility in domestic chickens.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 1976,90, 870–876.
Orians, G. H., &Pearson, N. E. On the theory of central place foraging. In D. J. Horn, G. R. Stairs, & R. D. Mitchell (Eds.),Analysis of ecological systems. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1979.
Prestrude, A. M., &Crawford, F. T. Tonic immobility in the lizard,Iguana iguana.Animal Behaviour, 1970,18, 391–395.
Ratner, S. C. Comparative aspects of hypnosis. In J. E. Gordon (Ed.),Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
Ratner, S. C. Animal’s defenses: Fighting in predator-prey relations. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.),Advances in the study of communication and affect. (Vol. 2):Nonverbal communication of aggression. New York: Plenum Press, 1975.
Ratner, S. C., &Thompson, R. W. Immobility reactions (fear) of domestic fowl as a function of age and prior experience.Animal Behaviour, 1960,8, 186–191.
Rovee, C. K., Chiapparelli, W. J., &Kaufman, L. W. The influence of altered lighting regimes on the periodicity of death feigning.Physiology & Behavior, 1977,18, 179–182.
Rovee, C. K., Kaufman, L. W., Collier, G. H., &Kent, G. C., Jr. Periodicity of death feigning by domestic fowl in response to simulated predation.Physiology & Behavior, 1976,17, 891–895.
Rovee, C. K., &Kleinman, J. M. Developmental changes in tonic immobility in young chicks (Gallus gallus).Developmental Psychobiology, 1974,7, 71–77.
Rovee, C. K., &Luciano, D. P. Rearing influences on tonic immobility in three-day-old chicks (Gallus gallus).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,83, 351–354.
Rovee-Collier, C., Kaufman, L. W., &Farina, P. The critical cues for diurnal death feigning in young chicks: A functional analysis.American Journal of Psychology, 1980,93, 259–268.
Sandman, C. A., Kastin, A. J., &Schally, A. V. Behavioral inhibition as modified by melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) and light-dark conditions.Physiology & Behavior, 1971,6, 45–48.
Sargeant, A. B., &Eberhardt, L. E. Death feigning by ducks in response to predation by red foxes (Vulpes fulva).American Midland Naturalist, 1975,94, 108–119.
Schleidt, W. Über die Auslosung der Flucht vor Raubvogein bei Truthahn.Naturwissenschaften, 1961,48, 141–142.
Storer, R. W. Adaptive radiation of birds. In D. S. Farner & J. R. King (Eds.),Avian biology (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Ternes, J. W. Circadian susceptibility to animal hypnosis.Psychological Record, 1977,27, 15–19.
Thorpe, W. H. Learning and instinct in animals (2nd ed.). London: Methusen, 1963.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant MH-34125 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the senior author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rovee-Collier, C., Capatides, J.B., Fagen, J.W. et al. Selective habituation of defensive behavior: Evidence for predator-prey synchrony. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 127–133 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212319
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212319