Abstract
In five experiments, rats’ preference for a flavor was greater if the flavor had previously been consumed under low rather than high deprivation. This preference was conditioned in as few as three flavor-deprivation pairings (Experiment 1), and persisted through 28 test days, half under each deprivation level (Experiment 2). Rats never preferred the flavor associated with high deprivation even when calories were increased by giving 40 ml of 8% sucrose or when caloric density was increased to the equivalent of 20% sucrose. The preference for the low-deprivation flavor was greater when saccharin solutions were used rather than sucrose solutions, but the preference did emerge when sucrose solutions were used as testing proceeded and when a lower concentration of sucrose was used. We suggest that these preferences may be a result of flavor-taste associations rather than associations between flavors and postingestive consequences, and that the taste of the solutions under low deprivation is preferred to the taste under high deprivation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bolles, R. C., Hayward, L., &Crandall, C. Conditioned taste preferences based on caloric density.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1981,7, 59–69.
Capaldi, E. D., &Myers, D. E. Taste preferences as a function of food deprivation during original taste exposure.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1982,10, 211–219.
Collier, G. Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 184–191.
Collier, G., &Bolles, R. Hunger, thirst, and their interaction as determinants of sucrose consumption.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 633–641.
Davidson-Codjoe, M., &Holman, E. W. The effect of non-nutritive satiation on the learning of a flavor preference by rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1982,10, 220–222.
Ehrenfreund, D. Effect of drive on successive magnitude shift in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,76, 418–423.
Fanselow, M. S., &Birk, J. Flavor-flavor associations induce hedonic shifts in taste preference.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1982,10, 223–228.
Holman, E. W. Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preferences in rats.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 91–100. (a)
Holman, E. W. Some conditions for the dissociation of consummatory and instrumental behavior in rats.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 358–366. (b)
Holman, E. W. Irrelevant-incentive learning with flavors in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980,6, 126–136.
Kurtz, K. H., &Jarka, R. G. Position preference based on differential food privation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 518–521.
Lavin, M. J. The establishment of flavor-flavor associations using a sensory preconditioning training procedure.Learning and Motivation, 1976,7, 173–183.
Logue, A. W. Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 276–296.
Myers, D. E. Taste preferences and aversions based upon rats’ internal deprivation state. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1982.
Rescorla, R. W., &Cunningham, C. L. Within-compound flavor associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 267–275.
Revusky, S. H. Hunger level during food consumption: Effects on subsequent preference.Psychonomic Science, 1967,7, 109–110.
Revusky, S. Retention of a learned increase in the preference for a flavored solution.Behavioral Biology, 1974,11, 121–125.
Revusky, S., &Garcia, J. Learned associations over long delays. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capaldi, E.D., Myers, D.E., Campbell, D.H. et al. Conditioned flavor preferences based on hunger level during original flavor exposure. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 107–115 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212316
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212316