Abstract
Four pigeons were trained in a delayed conditional discrimination in which color and line cues jointly indicated trial outcome. These were either combined in advance of a retention interval (RI) or separately presented before and after the RI. The former procedure resulted in less forgetting over the RI, the difference increasing with longer RIs. In a second study, the line cue was presented redundantly before and after the RI, and then selectively omitted from either temporal location during probe tests. In general, the results indicated that the birds relied upon the line as a cue to a greater extent when it was compounded with the color in advance of the RI than when it was presented after the RI. The data support an interpretation based on anticipatory processing in working memory, which leads to better retention than retrospective remembering.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blough, D. S. Delayed matching in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1959,2, 151–160.
Farthing, G. W., Wagner, J. M., Gilmour, S., &Waxman, H. M. Short-term memory and information processing in pigeons.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 520–532.
Honig, W. K. Studies of working memory in the pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Honig, W. K., &Thompson, R. K. R. Retrospective and prospective processing in animal working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 16). New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Honig, W. K., &Wasserman, E. A. Performance of pigeons on delayed simple and conditional discriminations under equivalent training procedures.Learning and Motivation, 1981,12, 149–170.
Hunter, W. S. The delayed reaction in animals and children.Behavior Monographs, 1913,2, 1–86.
Nelson, K. R., &Wasserman, E. A. Temporal factors influencing the pigeon’s successive matching-to-sample performance: Sample duration, intertriai interval, and retention interval.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,30, 153–162.
Peterson, G. B., &Trapold, M. A. Effects of outcome expectancies on pigeons’ delayed conditional discrimination performance.Learning and Motivation, 1980,11, 267–288.
Peterson, G. B., Wheeler, R. L., &Trapold, M. A. Enhancement of pigeons’ conditional discrimination performance by expectancies of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 22–30.
Roberts, W. A., &Grant, D. S. Studies of short-term memory in the pigeon using the delayed matching-to-sample procedure. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.),Processes of animal memory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Smith, L. Delayed discrimination and delayed matching in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1967,10, 529–533.
Whalen, T. E. Support for a dual encoding model of short-term memory in the pigeon. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Dalhousie University, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant AO-102 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honig, W.K., Dodd, P.W.D. Delayed discriminations in the pigeon: The role of within-trial location of conditional cues. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 1–9 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212300
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212300