Abstract
The ability of visual CSs previously paired with flavored substances to substitute for those substances as conditional discriminative cues was examined in two Pavlovian appetitive conditioning experiments using rat subjects. In Experiment 1, a visual stimulus was first paired with the delivery of a sucrose solution. Then the rats were trained in conditional discrimination tasks in which sucrose delivery alone served as a conditional cue signaling whether or not a subsequent tone would be reinforced with food pellets. Subjects rapidly acquired discriminative performance to the tones, especially in a feature-negative condition in which sucrose delivery signaled when the tone would not be reinforced. In a subsequent test in which neither food nor sucrose was delivered, presentation of the visual CS also controlled discriminative performance to subsequently presented tones. Experiment 2 showed the ability of a visual CS to substitute for a flavored substance as a conditional cue to be highly stimulus specific. Experiment 2 also showed that a flavored substance was less effective as a conditional cue when it was made to be expected by preceding it with a previously associated visual signal than when it was made to be surprising by preceding it with a visual stimulus signaling another flavored liquid. These results indicate that CS-evoked representations of events can substitute for those events themselves in the control of previously established conditional discrimination performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bottjer, S. W., &Hearst, E. Food delivery as a conditional stimulus: Feature learning and memory in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979,31, 189–207.
Carter, D. E., &Werner, T. J. Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,29, 565–601.
Colwill, R. M., & Dickinson, A. Short-term retention of “surprising” events by pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 539–556.
Dickinson, A., &Mackintosh, N. J. Classical conditioning in animals.Annual Review of Psychology, 1978,29, 587–612.
Hearst, E. Stimulus relationships and feature selection in learning and behavior. In S. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Holland, P. C. Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1977,3, 77–104.
Holland, P. C. Acquisition of representation-mediated food aversions.Learning and Motivation, 1981,12, 1–18.
Holland, P. C., &Ross, R. T. Within-compound associations in serial compound conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1981,7, 228–241.
Jenkins, H. M., &Sainsbury, R. S. The development of stimulus control through differential reinforcement. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Fundamental issues in associative learning. Halifax: Dalhousie University Press, 1969.
Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Looney, T. S., &Griffin, R. W. A sequential feature-positive effect using tone as the distinguishing feature in an autoshaping procedure.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 401–405.
Moore, J. W., Newman, F. L., &Glasgow, B. Intertriai cues as discriminative stimuli in human eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79, 319–326.
Pearce, J. M., &Hall, G. A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review, 1980,6, 532–552.
Peterson, G. B., Wheeler, R. L., &Trapold, M. A. Enhancement of pigeons’ conditional discrimination performance by expectancies of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 22–30.
Rescorla, R. A. Conditioned inhibition and excitation. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Rescorla, R. A., &Holland, P. C. Behavioral studies of associative learning in animals.Annual Review of Psychology, 1982,33, 265–308.
Ross, R. T., &Holland, P. C. Conditioning of simultaneous and serial feature-positive discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1981,9, 293–303.
Terry, W. S. Effects of priming unconditioned stimulus representation in short-term memory on Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 354–369.
Terry, W. S., &Wagner, A. R. Short-term memory for “surprising” vs. “expected” unconditioned stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1975,1, 122–133.
Wagner, A. R. Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant BNS 79-03853 from the National Science Foundation. Reprints are not available.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holland, P.C., Forbes, D.T. Control of conditional discrimination performance by CS-evoked event representations. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 249–256 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212278
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212278