Abstract
It has been reported previously that rats prefer a flavor they consumed under high deprivation to a flavor they consumed under low deprivation (Revusky, 1967). Here it was found that this preference occurs only if nutritive solutions are used and the flavors are given preceding and following eating. If flavors are given separately from the daily feeding, rats prefer the flavor given under low deprivation, whether or not a nutritive solution is used (Experiment 3). If flavors are given before and after the daily feeding, rats prefer the flavor they had under high deprivation (before feeding) more if sucrose solutions are used than if saccharin solutions are used and more on a high-deprivation test than on a low-deprivation test (Experiments 1 and 2). It was concluded that the “incentive value” of consumption is not necessarily higher under high deprivation than under low deprivation. The preference for the low-deprivation flavor obtained here may reflect a greater proportional rewarding effect of consumption under low deprivation or may reflect an aversion to the flavor consumed under high deprivation. Perhaps a small taste of flavor under high deprivation initiates responses of digestion that are unsatisfied and thus aversive, and the more so the higher the deprivation level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bolles, R. C. Interactions with motivation. In M. H. Marx (Ed.).Learning: Interactions. London: Macmillan, 1970.
Bolles, R. C., Haywaed, L., &Crandall, C. Conditioned taste preferences based on caloric density.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1981,7, 59–69.
Capaldi, E. D., &Davidson, T. L. Control of instrumental behavior by deprivation stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1979,5, 355–367.
Capaldi, E. D., &Hovancik, J. R. Effects of previous body weight level on rats’ straight-alley performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 93–97.
Capaldi, E. D., Viveiros, D. M., &Davidson, T. L. Deprivation stimulus intensity and incentive factors in the control of instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1981,7, 140–149.
Eisenberoer, R., Myers, A. K., &Kaplan, R. M. Persistent deprivation-shift effect opposite in direction from incentive contrast.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,99, 400–404.
Holman, E. W. Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor preferences in rats.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 91–100.
Holman, E. W. Irrelevant-incentive learning with flavors in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980,6, 126–136.
Kurtz, K. H., &Jarka, R. G. Position preference based on differential food privation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 518–521.
Peck, J. H., &Ader, R. Illness-induced taste aversion under states of deprivation and satiation.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1974,2, 6–8.
Revusky, S. H. Hunger level during food consumption: Effects on subsequent preference.Psychonomic Science, 1967,7, 109–110.
Revusky, S., &Garcia, J. Learned associations over long delays. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Revusky, S., Pohl, R. W., &Coombes, S. Flavor aversions and deprivation state.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 543–549.
Smith, M. P., &Capretta, P. J. Effects of drive level and experience on the reward value of saccharin solutions.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956,49, 553–557.
Wilson, C. L., Sherman, J. E., &Holman, E. W. Aversion to the reinforcer differentially affects conditioned reinforcement and instrumental responding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1981,7, 165–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a Purdue Research Foundation David Ross grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capaldi, E.D., Myers, D.E. Taste preferences as a function of food deprivation during original taste exposure. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 211–219 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212272