Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings

  • Published: January 1991
  • Volume 50, pages 15–18, (1991)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings
Download PDF
  • Frederick L. Kitterle1 &
  • Linda M. Selig1 
  • 525 Accesses

  • 56 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The time needed to decide whether the second of two successively presented sinusoidal gratings was of a higher or lower spatial frequency than the first was measured for spatial frequencies of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 cycles per degree (cpd) presented in either the left visual field (LVF) or right visual field (RVF). A LVF advantage was found for discriminating within the low-spatial-frequency range (i.e., 1 and 2 cpd), whereas a RVF advantage was found for discriminating within the high-spatial-frequency range (i.e., 4-12 cpd). These findings support the conclusion that hemispheric asymmetries in the processing of gratings arise when comparisons-are -made between the output of spatial-frequency channels.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Human perception of spatial frequency varies with stimulus orientation and location in the visual field

Article Open access 17 October 2023

Wladimir Kirsch & Wilfried Kunde

The spatial-frequency characteristics of the visual system in schizophrenia

Article 01 May 2015

I. I. Shoshina, Y. E. Shelepin, … K. O. Novikova

Neural correlates of lateral modulation and perceptual filling-in in center-surround radial sinusoidal gratings: an fMRI study

Article Open access 27 September 2022

Yih-Shiuan Lin, Chien-Chung Chen & Mark W. Greenlee

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Badcock, D. R., &Sevdalis, E. (1987). Masking by uniform field flicker: Some practical considerations.Perception,15, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S. (1989). Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research.Brain & Cognition,11, 238–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, S., Kitterle, F. L., & Hellige, J. (in press). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency.Brain & Cognition.

  • Fiorentini, A., &Berardi, N. (1984). Right-hemisphere superiority in the discrimination of spatial phase.Perception,13, 695–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowska, A., Semenza, C., Denes, G., &Testa, S. (1989). Impaired grating discrimination following right hemisphere damage.Neuropsychologia,27, 259–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. A. (1981). Spatial frequency effects in masking by light.Vision Research,21, 861–866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee, M. W., &Breitmeyer, B. (1989). A choice reaction time analysis of spatial frequency discrimination.Vision Research,11, 1575–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle, F. L. (1986). Psychophysics of lateral tachistoscopic presentation.Brain & Cognition,5, 131–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle, F. L., &Christman, S. (1991). Hemispheric symmetries and asymmetries in processing spatial frequency. In F. L. Kitterle (Ed.),Cerebral laterality: Theory and research: The Toledo symposium (pp. 201–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle, F. L., Christman, S., &Hellige, J. (1990). Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle, F. L., Corwin, T. R., &Berta, J. (1979). Masking of sinusoidal targets by uniform fields of unequal duration.Journal of the Optical Society of America,69, 1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitterle, F. L., Hellige, J., & Christman, S. (1990).Hemispheric differences in the processing of sine- and square-wave gratings. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Kitterle, F., &Kaye, R. S. (1985). Hemispheric symmetry in contrast and orientation sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1982). The cerebral balance of power: Confrontation or cooperation?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1983). Role of input in visual hemispheric asymmetries.Psychological Bulletin,93, 481–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1985). Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 846–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1987). Failures to confirm the spatial-frequency hypothesis: Fatal blow or healthy complication?Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 412–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J., &Hellige, J. (1986). Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries.Brain & Cognition,5, 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szelag, E., Budohoska, W., &Koltuska, B. (1987). Hemispheric differences in the perception of gratings.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,25, 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1985). Detection and identification: How are they related?Journal of the Optical Society of America A,2, 1457–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., Gille, J., &Barker, R. (1982). Simultaneous visual detection and identification: Theory and data.Journal of the Optical Society of America,72, 1642–1651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, 43606, Toledo, OH

    Frederick L. Kitterle & Linda M. Selig

Authors
  1. Frederick L. Kitterle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda M. Selig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported by an Academic Challenge Grant from the State of Ohio to enhance research in experimental psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitterle, F.L., Selig, L.M. Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings. Perception & Psychophysics 50, 15–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212201

Download citation

  • Received: 04 April 1990

  • Accepted: 20 February 1991

  • Issue Date: January 1991

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212201

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Spatial Frequency
  • Comparison Stimulus
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry
  • Lower Spatial Frequency
  • Right Hemisphere
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

5.135.140.155

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature