Abstract
The “disembodied eye” phenomenon (Corcoran, 1977), that is, the observation that a cutaneous (tactile) pattern is perceived as right-left reversed or not, depending on whether it is presented on the forehead or the back of the head, was extended by incorporating a top-bottom axis into a model of the frame of reference in cutaneous-pattern perception. In two experiments, 21 and 15 subjects were asked to report the letter perceived when one of four letters (p, q, b, or d) was tactually presented. The sites studied were vertical body surfaces (Experiment 1) and hands alongside the body (Experiment 2). The positions for the presentations varied according to the height (head, shoulder, waist, thigh, and calf levels) and the orientation of the surface: forward-, backward-, and side-facing. Although the results for the head and back surfaces supported the notion of a “disembodied eye” behind the individual, other frames were needed: On the forward-facing surfaces below the waist, the prevailing perception was 1800 rotated, as if the subjects were looking at the surface by bending forward. An additional frame of reference was introduced for the forward-facing surfaces in lower positions and was described as head axes projected onto body surfaces within the possibility of actual body movements.
References
Allen, D. B., &Rudy, K. P. (1970). Perception of simple figures drawn upon the body surface.Perceptual & Motor Skills,30, 369–370.
Corballis, M. C., Zbrodoff, J., &Roldan, C. E. (1976). What’s up in mental rotation?Perception & Psychophysics,19, 525–530.
Corcoran, D. W. (1977). The phenomena of the disembodied eye or is it a matter of personal geography?Perception,6, 247–253.
Duke, J. D. (1966). Perception of finger drawings upon the body surface.Journal of General Psychology,75, 305–314.
Everitt, B. S. (1977).The analysis of contingency tables. London: Chapman and Hall.
Holmes, D. S., Roeckelein, J. E., &Olmstead, J. A. (1968). Determinants of tactual perception of finger-drawn symbols: Reappraisal.Perceptual & Motor Skills,27, 659–672.
Howard, I. P. (1982).Hurnan visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
Howard, I. P., &Templeton, W. B. (1966).Hurnan spatial orientation. New York: Wiley.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
Krech, D., &Crutchfield, R. S. (1958).Elements of psychology. New York: Knopf.
Natsoulas, T., &Dubanoski, R. A. (1964). Inferring the locus and orientation of the perceiver from responses to stimulation of the skin.American Journal of Psychology,77, 281–285.
Oldfield, S. R., &Phillips, J. R. (1983). The spatial characteristics of tactile form perception.Perception,12, 615–626.
Parsons, L. M., &Shimojo, S. (1987). Perceived spatial organization of cutaneous patterns on surfaces of the human body in various positions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 488–504.
Rock, I. (1956). The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment.American Journal of Psychology,69, 513–528.
Rock, I. (1973).Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
Rock, I., &Heimer, W. (1957). The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form.American Journal of Psychology,70, 493–511.
Sekiyama, K. (1981, November). [Point of view in tactile perception: On the “reversal phenomena” (in Japanese)]. Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Conference of the Kansai Psychological Association. Kobe, Japan.
Sekiyama, K. (1982). Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 89–95.
Shimojo, S. (1981). [On mental rotation experiments: A methodological study on imagery researches (in Japanese)].Japanese Psychological Review,24, 16–41.
Shimojo, S., Sasaki, M., Parsons, L. M., &Torii, S. (1989). Mirror reversal by blind subjects in cutaneous perception and motor production of letters and numbers.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 145–152.
Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., &Wapner, S. (1972).Personality through perception. Westport, CI: Greenwood Press. (Original work published 1954)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 60790005 to the author. It was carried out while the author was at Osaka City University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sekiyama, K. Importance of head axes in perception of cutaneous patterns drawn on vertical body surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 481–492 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212182
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212182
Keywords
- Front Surface
- Back Surface
- Cutaneous Pattern
- Visual Frame
- Palm Facing