Skip to main content

The perception of length on curved and flat surfaces

Abstract

In three experiments, observers judged the apparent extents of spatial intervals along the surface of a curved cylinder or a flat plane that was binocularly viewed in a natural, indoor environment. The observers’ judgments of surface lengths were precise and reliable but were also inaccurate and subject to relatively large constant errors. These distortions differed among the observers, but they tended to perceive lengths oriented along the curved dimension of the cylinder as being longer than physically equivalent lengths in the noncurved dimension. This phenomenon did not occur when the observers judged curved and noncurved paths on the flat surface. In addition, some observers’ judgments of length were affected by changes in the distance to the cylinder, whereas others were affected by the cylinder’s orientation in space. These results demonstrate that the perception of length on surfaces is highly dependent on the particular context in which the length occurs.

References

  • Armstrong, L., &Marks, L. E. (1997). Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1200–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C. (1970).Psychophysical analysis of visual space. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. C., &Biersdorf, W. R. (1967). Quantitative functions for size and distance judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battro, A. M., Netto, S. P., &Rozestraten, R. J. A. (1976). Riemannian geometries of variable curvature in visual space: Visual alleys, horopters, and triangles in big open fields.Perception,5, 9–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. F. (1931). The visual perception of velocity.Psychologische Forschung,14, 199–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornilleau-Pérès, V., &Droulez, J. (1989). Visual perception of surface curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. T. (1966).Elements of psychophysics (Vol. 1; H. E. Adler, Trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (Original work published 1860)

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, J. P., Buckley, D., &Duke, P. A. (1996). Evidence for good recovery of lengths of real objects seen with natural stereo viewing.Perception,25, 129–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilinsky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space.Psychological Review,58, 460–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillam, B., Chambers, D., &Russo, T. (1988). Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harway, N. I. (1963). Judgment of distance in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 385–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. (1925).Helmholtz s treatise on physiological optics (Vol. 3; J. P. C. Southall, Trans). Menasha, WI: Optical Society of America. (Original work published 1866)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. C. (1982).Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M., Da Silva, J. A., Fujita, N., &Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action.Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 906–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.Vision Research,21, 491–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, H. F., Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., &Lindsey, D. T. (1996). Spatial interactions in perceived speed.Perception,25, 815–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. F., &Lappin, J. S. (1992). The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 386–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. F., &Todd, J. T. (1995). The perception of 3-D structure from contradictory optical patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 826–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. E., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., &Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. J., &Graham, M. E. (1983). Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces.Science,221, 1409–1411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, E. (1950). Visual figures apparently incompatible with geometry.Acta Psychologica,7, 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thouless, R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object: 1.British Journal of Psychology,21, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 483–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. H. (1978).The sense of touch (H. E. Ross, Trans.). New York: Academic Press. (Original work published 1834)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1901).Lectures on human and animal psychology (J. E. Creighton & E. B. Titchener, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1892).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Farley Norman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, J.F., Lappin, J.S. & Norman, H.F. The perception of length on curved and flat surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1133–1145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212118

Keywords

  • Constant Error
  • Actual Length
  • Weber Fraction
  • Viewing Distance
  • Equivalent Length