Skip to main content

Object permanence in cats and dogs

Abstract

Object permanence was assessed for cats and dogs, using tasks analogous to those typically employed for human infants. Neither species solved all of the problems correctly when rewarded only by the discovery of a hidden toy. However, both species showed that they had fully developed concepts of object permanence when the problems were changed so that the animals had to search for hidden food in an odor-control procedure. These results indicate that sensorimotor intelligence is completely developed in these nonprimates.

References

  1. Cerella, J. Visual classes and natural categories in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 68–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Czerny, P., &Thomas, R. K. Sameness-difference judgments inSiamiri sciureus based on volumetric cues.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1975,3, 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gagné, R. M. Contributions of learning to human development.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 177–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gruber, H. E., Girous, J. S., &Banuazizi, A. The development of object permanence in the cat.Developmental Psychology, 1971,4, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., &Cable, C. Natural concepts in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hülse, S. H., &Dorsky, N. P. Serial pattern learning by rats: Transfer of a formally defined stimulus relationship and the significance of reinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1979,7, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pasnak, R. Acquisition of prerequisites to conservation by macaques.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1979,5, 194–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Piaget, J. Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Müssen (Ed.),Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piaget, J., &Inhelder, B. La psychologie de l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uzgiris, I. C., &Hunt, J. McV. Assessment in infancy. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaughter, R. M., Smotherman, W., &Ordy, J. M. Development of object permanence in the squirrel monkey.Developmental Psychology, 1972,7, 34–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wise, K. L., Wise, L. A., &Zimmerman, R. R. Piagetian object permanence in the infant rhesus monkey.Developmental Psychology, 1974,10, 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wood, S., Moriarty, K. M., Gardner, B. T., &Gardner, R. A. Object permanence in child and chimpanzee.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woodruff, G., Premack, D., &Kennel, K. Conservation of liquid and solid quantity by the chimpanzee.Science, 1978,202, 991–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Pasnak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triana, E., Pasnak, R. Object permanence in cats and dogs. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 135–139 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212035

Download citation

Keywords

  • Nonhuman Primate
  • Hiding Place
  • Object Permanence
  • Invisible Displacement
  • Visible Displacement