Abstract
Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) and titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch) were tested in three two-choice visual discrimination experiments. Although, on average, squirrel monkeys performed more accurately than titis, the range of response accuracies in the two species overlapped considerably in all three experiments and changes in response accuracy over test sessions and across experiments were similar in the two species. Thus, the species shared several behavioral characteristics expected of New World primates in this setting. Squirrel monkeys’ performance appeared to be more affected than titis’ by task difficulty, and squirrel monkeys were individually less consistent than titis. These differences were associated with higher activity levels and briefer overt attentiveness to the repetitive task in squirrel monkeys and, conversely, with lower activity levels, slower working speeds, and sustained interest in the task in titis. The associated differences are discussed in relation to each species performance in other laboratory settings and the characteristic patterns of foraging and use of space in nature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Fragaszy, D. M. Comparative studies ofSaimiri andCallicebus: The expression of behavioral predispositions in social behavior. In D. M. Fragaszy & J. Vogt,J. Field and laboratory studies of social behavior in New World primates. Book in preparation, 1980.
References
Baldwin, J. D., &Baldwin, J. I. Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) in natural habitats in Panama, Colombia, Brazil, and Peru.Primates, 1971,12, 45–61.
Baldwin, J. D., &Baldwin, J. I. The ecology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii) in a natural forest in Western Panama.Folia Primatologica, 1972,18, 161–184.
Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,71, 32–48.
Cubicciotti, D., III, &Mason, W. A. Comparative studies of social behavior inCallicebus andSaimiri: Male-female emotional attachments.Behavioral Biology, 1975,16, 185–197.
Devine, J. V. Stimulus attributes and training procedures in learning-set formation of rhesus and cebus monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1970,73, 62–67.
Fragaszy, D. M. Contrasts in feeding behavior in squirrel and titi monkeys. In D. C. Chivers (Ed.),Recent advances in primatology (Vol. 1)Behaviour. London: Academic Press, 1978. (a)
Fragaszy, D. M. Comparative studies of visuo-spatial performance squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) and titi monkeys (Callicebus) (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis, 1978).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978,39, 3038B. (University Microfilms No. 78-22, 643). (b)
Fragaszy, D. M. Squirrel and titi monkeys in a novel environment. In J. Erwin, T. Maple, & G. Mitchell (Eds.),Captivity and behavior. New York: Van Nostrand, 1979.
Fragaszy, D. M. Comparative studies of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) and titi monkeys (Callicebus) in travel tasks.Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 1980,54, 1–36.
Fragaszy, D. M., &Mason, W. A. Response to novelty inSaimiri andCallicebus: Influence of social context.Primates, 1978,19, 311–331.
Fragaszy, R. J., &Fragaszy, D. M. A program to generate Gellermann (pseudorandom) series of binary states.Behavioral Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1978,10, 83–88.
Harlow, H. F. Primate learning. In C. P. Stone (Ed.),Comparative psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951.
Hinde, R. A., &Stevenson-Hinde, J. Constraints on learning. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Hladik, A., &Hladik, C. M. Rapports trophiques entre vegetation et primates dans la forêt de Barro Colorado (Panama).Terre et Vie, 1969,1, 25–117.
Kinzey, W. G. Positional behavior and ecology inCallicebus torquatus.Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 1976,20, 468–480.
Kinzey, W. G. Feeding behaviour and molar features in two species of titi monkey. In D. C. Chivers (Ed.),Recent advances in primatology (Vol. 1)Behaviour. London: Academic Press, 1978.
Kinzey, W. G. Callicebus. In R. A. Mittermeier & A. F. Coimbra-Filho (Eds.),New World primatology. Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Academy of Sciences, in press.
Mason, W. A. Social organization of the South American monkey,Callicebus moloch: A preliminary report.Tulane Studies in Zoology, 1966,13, 23–28.
Mason, W. A. Use of space byCallicebus groups. In P. Jay (Ed.),Primates: Field studies in adaptation and variability. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.
Mason, W. A. Field and laboratory studies of social organization inSaimiri andCallicebus. In L. A. Rosenblum (Ed.),Primate behavior: Developments in field and laboratory research. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Mason, W. A. Comparative studies of social behavior inCallicebus andSaimiri: Behavior of male-female pairs.Folia Primatologica, 1974,22, 1–8.
Polidora, V. J. Learning abilities of New World monkeys.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1964,22, 245–252.
Polidora, V. J. Visual pattern discrimination problems scaled for discriminative difficulty. In D. Starck, R. Schneider, & H.-J. Kuhn (Eds.),Progress in primatology. Stuttgart: Gustave Fischer Verlag, 1967.
Polidora, V. J. Stimulus correlates of visual pattern discrimination by monkeys: Multidimensional analyses.Perception & Psychophysics, 1966,1, 405–414.
Polidora, V. J., &Fletcher, H. J. An analysis of the importance of S-R spatial contiguity for proficient primate discrimination performance.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 224–230.
Polidora, V. J., &Thompson, W. J. Stimulus correlates of visual pattern discrimination by monkeys: Area and contour.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,57, 264–269.
Rowell, T. E. Social organization of wild talapoin monkeys.American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1973,38, 593–597.
Rumbaugh, D. M. Learning and sensory capacities of the squirrel monkey in phylogenetic perspective. In L. A. Rosenblum & R. W. Cooper (Eds.),The squirrel monkey. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Seligman, M. E. P., &Hager, J. S. The biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton, 1972.
Shettleworth, S. J. Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.),Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Sutherland, N. S., &Mackintosh, N. J. Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Thorington, R. W. Feeding and acitivty ofCebus andSaimiri in a Colombian forest. In D. Starck, R. Schneider, & H.-J. Kuhn (Eds.),Progress in primatology. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1967.
Thorington, R. W. Observations of squirrel monkeys in a Colombian forest. In L. A. Rosenblum & R. W. Cooper (Eds.),The squirrel monkey. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Tilson, R. C., &Tenaza, R. R. Monogamy and duetting in an Old World monkey.Nature, 1976,263, 320–321.
Welles, J. F. The anthropoid hand: A comparative study of prehension (Doctoral dissertation, Tulane University, 1973).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973,34, 1890B. (University Microfilms No. 73-25, 309).
Woodburne, L. S. Visual acuity ofSaimiri sciureus.Psychonomic Science, 1965,3, 307–308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fragaszy, D.M. Comparative performance in discrimination learning tasks in two New World primates (Saimiri sciureus andCallicebus moloch). Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 127–134 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212034
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212034