Abstract
A classically conditioned tail flexion in rats with a white noise as the conditioned stimulus and a tailshock as the unconditioned stimulus is shown to arise as a result of contingent presentation of the two stimuli rather than from sensitization or pseudoconditioning. After achieving an asymptote for conditioned tail flexion, different groups received response-contingent tail-shock increment, decrement, or omission. None of these treatments appreciably altered the probability of a conditioned response. Evidence is presented demonstrating that the response was sensitive to changes in the relationship between the stimuli and that the subjects could differentiate the various shock levels. The present data are viewed as inconsistent with the preparatory response hypothesis, which posits that classically conditioned behavior depends upon intrinsic reinforcement of components of the conditioned response syndrome. The possibility is discussed that classically conditioned responses observed in the laboratory are often only part of a larger, perhaps more clearly instrumental, set of behaviors that would occur in the unrestrained animal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Miller, R. R., Greco, C., Vigorito, M., & Marlin, N. A.Warning-signal effects on the aversiveness of fixed-electrode tailshock. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Phoenix, Arizona, November 1979.
References
Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.
Bolles, R. C., Stokes, L. W., &Younger, M. S. Does CS termination reinforce avoidance behavior?Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966,62, 201–207.
Brogden, W. J. The effect of frequency of reinforcement upon the level of conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1939,24, 419–431.
Brogden, W. J., Lipman, E. A., &Culler, E. The role of incentive in conditioning and extinction.American Journal of Psychology, 1938,51, 109–117.
Clark, C. G., &Prokasy, W. F. Manipulation of response-contingent unconditioned-stimulus intensity in human eyelid conditioning: A two-phase model analysis.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 277–282.
Coleman, S. R. Consequences of response-contingent changes in the unconditioned stimulus intensity upon the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) nictitating membrane response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975,88, 591–595.
Coleman, S. R., &Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning and the “law of effect”: Historical and empirical assessment.Behaviorism, 1979,7, 1–33.
D’Amato, M. R., &Safarjan, W. R. Preference for information about shock duration in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1979,7, 89–94.
Fanselow, M. S. Naloxone attenuates rats’ preference for signaled shock.Physiological Psychology, 1979,1, 70–74.
Fanselow, M. S. Signaled shock-free periods and preference for signaled shock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980,6, 65–80.
Furedy, J. J., &Murray, H. G. Evaluation of informational control and preparatory response factors in classical aversive conditioning.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 409–414.
Gormezano, I., &Coleman, S. R. The law of effect and CR contingent modification of the UCS.Conditional Reflex, 1973,8, 41–56.
Kamin, L. J. The effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956,49, 420–424.
Kamin, L. J. The effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning: An extension.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1957,11, 48–56.
Kimble, G. A. Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.
Kimble, G. A., &Ost, J. W. P. A conditioned inhibitory process in eyelid conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,61, 150–156.
Kimmel, H. D. Inhibition of the unconditioned response in classical conditioning.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 232–240.
Kimmel, H. D., &Burns, R. A. Adaptational aspects of conditioning. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive psychology (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Kremer, E. F. Truly random and traditional control procedures in CER conditioning in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,74, 203–210.
Lykken, D. J., &Tellegen, A. On the validity of the preception hypothesis.Psychophysiology, 1974,11, 125–132.
Mackintosh, N. J. The psychology of animal learning. London: Academic Press, 1974.
Marlin, N. A., Sullivan, J. M., Berk, A. M., &Miller, R. R. Preference for information about intensity of signaled tailshock.Learning and Motivation, 1979,10, 85–97.
Martin, I., &Levey, A. B. The genesis of the classical conditioned response. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1969.
Miller, R. R., Marlin, N. A., &Berk, A. M. Reliability and sources of control of preference for signaled shock.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1977,5, 303–308.
Moore, B. R. The role of directed Pavlovian reactions in simple instrumental learning in the pigeon. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Mowrer, O. H. Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1960.
Pavlov, J. P. Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1927.
Perkins, C. C., Jr. The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 341–348.
Perkins, C. C., Jr. An analysis of the concept of reinforcement.Psychological Review, 1968,75, 155–172.
Rescorla, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 71–80.
Rescorla, R. A., &Solomon, R. L. Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.Psychological Review, 1967,74, 151–182.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Schlosberg, H. Conditioned responses in the white rat.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1934,45, 303–305.
Schlosberg, H. The relationship between success and the laws of conditioning.Psychological Review, 1937,44, 379–394.
Scott, D. S., &Barber, T. X. Cognitive control of pain: Effects of multiple cognitive strategies.Psychological Record, 1977,27, 373–383.
Seligman, M. E. P. Chronic fear produced by unpredictable shock.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 402–411.
Wagner, A. R., Siegel, S., Thomas, E., &Ellison, G. D. Reinforcement history and the extinction of a conditioned salivary response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964,58, 354–358.
Wahlsten, D. L., &Cole, M. Classical and avoidance training of leg flexion in the dog. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
Zener, K. The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response.American Journal of Psychology, 1937,50, 384–403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was funded by NSF Grant BMS75-03383 and NIMH Grant MH33881. R.R.M. was supported by NIMH Research Scientist Development Award K2-MH00061.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, R.R., Greco, C. & Vigorito, M. Classically conditioned tail flexion in rats: CR-contingent modification of US intensity as a test of the preparatory response hypothesis. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 80–88 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212029
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212029