Abstract
To demonstrate a facilitating stimulus effect, as opposed to an incentive effect, of food reward, rats were trained on an easy, light-dark discrimination with different amounts of reward for correct and incorrect responses (1-0, 2-0, 3-1, and 5-1 pellets, respectively), and with shock or no shock administered in the correct goalbox. Both errors and trials to criterion were fewer with a large reward differential (LRD: 2-0 and 5-1), as compared with a small reward differential (SRD: 1-0 and 3-1), but were not affected by the “base” reinforcement condition of either 1 or 0 pellets for the incorrect response. In addition, choice and arm speeds during early training were positively related to the combined, or average, number of pellets contingent upon both correct and incorrect responses, indicating a generalization of reward expectancies. Although shock uniformly suppressed arm speeds under all reward conditions, it facilitated discrimination learning in the SRD conditions. That such facilitation occurred only when the conditions of reward for correct and incorrect responses were relatively similar indicates that not only shock, but also food can function as a distinctive cue: As a stimulus selectively applied to one response, it can decrease the similarity of the alternatives, and, in this manner, it can faciltate performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bower, G. H. A contrast effect in differential conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,62, 196–199.
Fago, G. C., &Fowler, H. Facilitated discrimination learning as effected by response-contingent neutral and aversive stimuli.Learning and Motivation, 1972,3, 20–30.
Fowler, H. Suppression and facilitation by response contingent shock. In F. R. Brush (Ed.),A versive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Fowler, H. Facilitating stimulus effects of reward and punishment: Discriminability as a general principle. In D. A. Routh (Ed.),Learning, speech, and the complex effects of punishment. New York: Plenum Press, 1981, in press.
Fowler, H., Fago, G. C., &Wischner, G. J. Shock-right facilitation in an easy noncorrection problem as effected by delay of reward.Learning and Motivation, 1971,2, 235–245.
Fowler, H., Goldman, L., &Wischner, G. J. Sodium amytal and the shock-right intensity function for visual discrimination learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,65, 155–159.
Fowler, H., Spelt, P. F., &Wischner, G. J. Discrimination performance as affected by training procedure, problem difficulty, and shock for the correct response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,75, 432–436.
Fowler, H., &Wischner, G. J. Discrimination performance as affected by problem difficulty and shock for either the correct or incorrect response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 413–418.
Fowler, H., &Wischner, G. J. The varied functions of punishment in discrimination learning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
Hulse, S. H. Cognitive structure and serial pattern learning by animals. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Logan, F. A., &Wagner, A. R. Reward and punishment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1965.
Wischner, G. J., &Fowler, H. Discrimination performance as affected by duration of shock for either the correct or incorrect response.Psychonomic Science, 1964,1, 239–240.
Wischner, G. J., Fowler, H., &Kushnick, S. A. Effect of strength of punishment for “correct” and “incorrect” responses on visual discrimination performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 131–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported in part by Grant MH-08482 from the National Institute of Mental Health, United States Public Health Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fowler, H., Hochhauser, M. & Wischner, G.J. Facilitating stimulus effects of reward and punishment in discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 16–20 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212020
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212020