Advertisement

Perception & Psychophysics

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 549–560 | Cite as

Aging and judgments of duration: Effects of task complexity and method of estimation

  • Fergus I. M. CraikEmail author
  • Janine F. Hay
Article

Abstract

The effects of aging on judgments of short temporal durations were explored using the prospective paradigm and the methods of verbal estimation and production. Younger and older adults performed a perceptual judgment task at five levels of complexity for periods of 30, 60, and 120 sec. Participants either continued to perform the task for a specified interval (production) or were stopped and then verbally estimated the interval. Older adults gave shorter verbal estimates and longer productions than did younger adults. The methods of verbal estimation and production yielded approximately equal duration judgment ratios once range effects were taken into account. Task complexity had little effect. The major conclusion is that duration judgment ratios decrease from younger to older adults when the intervals are filled with a mental task.

Keywords

Time Perception Internal Clock Verbal Estimation Task Duration Duration Judgment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adam, N., Rosner, B. S., Hosick, E. C, &Clark, D. L. (1971). Effect of anesthetic drugs on time production and alpha rhythm.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, L. G. (1979). The perception of time.Perception & Psycho physics,26, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attneave, F. (1959).Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  4. Binkofski, F., &Block, R. A. (1996). Accelerated time experience after left frontal cortex lesion.Neuroscase,2, 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Block, R. A., Conti, D. E., Duncan, A. M., & Zakay, D. (1997, November).Workload influences on duration judgments: Meta-analytic findings. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  7. Block, R. A., &Reed, M. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 656–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, R. A., &Zakay, D. (1996). Models of psychological time revisited. In H. Helfrich (Ed.),Timeandmind (pp. 171–195). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  9. Block, R. A., &Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, R. A., Zakay, D., &Hancock, P. A. (1998). Human aging and duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.Psychology & Aging,13, 584–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casini, L., & Ivry, R. B. (1999).Effects of divided attention on temporal processing in patients with lesions of the cerebellum or frontal lobe. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.),Timing and time perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 423, pp. 566–582). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  14. Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Age differences in human memory. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 384–420). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  15. Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  16. Craik, F. I. M., Morris, L. W., Morris, R. G., &Loewen, E. R. (1990). Aging, source amnesia, and frontal lobe functioning.Psychology & Aging,5, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisler, A. D., &Eisler, H. (1994). Subjective time scaling: Influence of age, gender, and type A and type B behavior.Chronobiologia,21, 185–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Feifel, H. (1957). Judgment of time in younger and older persons.Journal of Gerontology,12, 71–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation oftime.Annual Review of Psychology,35, 1–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Frankenhaeuser, M. (1959).Estimation of time: An experimental study. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiskell.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, W. J. (1990).About time: Inventing the fourth dimension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goldstone, S., &Kirkham, J. E. (1968). The effects of secobarbital and dextroamphetamine upon time judgment: Intersensory factors.Psychopharmacologia,13, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Held, R. (1965, November). Plasticity in sensory-motor systems.Scientific American,213 (5), 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hicks, R. E., Gualtieri, C. T., Mayo, J. P., Jr., &Perez-Reyes, M. (1984). Cannabis, atropine and temporal information processing.Neuropsychobiology,12, 229–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W, &Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.American Journal of Psychology,89, 719–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, M. R., &Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time.Psychological Review,96, 459–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Joubert, C. E. (1983). Subjective acceleration of time: Death anxiety and sex differences.Perceptual & Motor Skills,57, 49–50.Google Scholar
  28. Lemlich, R. (1975). Subjective acceleration of time with aging.Perceptual & Motor Skills,41, 235–238.Google Scholar
  29. Mangan, P. A., Bolinskey, P. K., &Rutherford, A. L. (1997). Underestimation of time during aging: The result of age-related dopaminergic changes?Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,23, 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Mangels, J. A., Ivry, R. B., &Shimizu, N. (1998). Dissociable contributions of the prefrontal and neocerebellar cortex to time perception.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mcdowd, J. M., &Craik, F. I. M. (1988). Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception.Cognitive Brain Research,3, 227–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Michon, J. A. (1990). Implicit and explicit representations of time. In R. A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 37–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Ornstein, R. E. (1969).On the experience of time. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Polyukhov, A. M. (1989). Subjective time estimation in relation to age, health, and interhemispheric brain asymmetry.Zeitschrift für Gerontologie,22, 79–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Poynter, W. D. (1983). Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience.Memory & Cognition,11, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rock, I., &Harris, C. S. (1967, May). Vision and touch.Scientific American,216(5), 96–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Salthouse, T. A., Rogan, J. D., &Prill, K. A. (1984). Division of attention: Age differences on a visually presented memory task.Memory & Cognition,12, 613–620.Google Scholar
  39. Salthouse, T. A., Wright, R., &Ellis, C. L. (1979). Adult age and the rate of an internal clock.Journal of Gerontology,34, 53–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schroots, J. J. F., &Birren, J. E. (1990). Concepts of time and aging in science. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, N. C. (1969). The effect on time estimation of increasing the complexity of a cognitive task.Journal of General Psychology,81, 231–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tinklenberg, J. R., Roth, W. T., &Koppell, B. S. (1976). Marijuana and ethanol: Differential effects on time perception, heart rate, and subjective response.Psychopharmacology,49, 275–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock.” PsychologicalMonographs: General & Applied,77 (No.13, Whole No. 576), 1–13.Google Scholar
  44. Walker, J. L. (1977). Time estimation and total subjective time.Perceptual & Motor Skills,44, 527–532.Google Scholar
  45. Welford, A. T. (1958).Ageingandhuman skill. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to aging.Psychological Bulletin,120, 272–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Woodrow, H. (1951). Time perception. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Hand-book of experimental psychology (pp. 1224–1236). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Woodworth, R. S. (1938).Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  49. Zakay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas. In R. A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Zakay, D. (1993). Time estimation methods: Do they influence prospective duration estimates?Perception,22, 91–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zakay, D., &Block, R. A. (1996). The role of attention in time estimation processes. In M. A. Pastor & J. Artieda (Eds.),Time, internal clocks and movement (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zakay, D., Nitzan, D., &Glicksohn, J. (1983). The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Rotman Research InstituteTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations