Abstract
In four experiments, increasing the intensities of both relevant and irrelevant auditory stimuli was found to increase response force (RF) in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time (RT) tasks. These results raise problems for models that localize the effects of auditory intensity on purely perceptual processes, indicating instead that intensity also affects motor output processes under many circumstances. In Experiment 1, simple RT, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks were compared, using the same stimuli for all tasks. Auditory stimulus intensity affected both RT and RF, and these effects were not modulated by task. In Experiments 2–4, an irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus accompanied a relevant visual stimulus, and the go/no-go and choice tasks were used. The intensity of the irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus was found to affect RT and RF, although the sizes of these effects depended somewhat on the temporal predictability of the accessory stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Balota, D. A. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time.Psychological Science,2, 153–157.
Angel, A. (1973). Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 193–200.
Balota, D. A., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1289–1302.
Bernstein, I. H. (1970). Can we see and hear at the same time? Some recent studies of intersensory facilitation of reaction time.Acta Psychologica33, 21–35.
Bernstein, I. H., Clark, M., &Edelstein, B. A. (1969). Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 567–569.
Bertelson, P., &Tisseyre, F. (1969). The time course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals.Acta Psychologica,30, 145–154.
Brebner, J. M. T., &Welford, A. T. (1980). Introduction: An historical background sketch. In A. T. Welford (Ed.),Reaction times (pp. 1–23). New York: Academic Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Broadbent, D. E. (1971 ).Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
Brunia, C. H. M. (1993). Waiting in readiness: Gating in attention and motor preparation.Psychophysiology,30, 327–339.
Brunia, C. H. M., &Boelhouwer, A. J. W. (1988). Reflexes as a tool: A windowin the central nervous system. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Burbeck, S. L., &Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.Perception & Psychophysics32, 117–133.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.Psychophysiology,26, 251–269.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.
Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster, Ed.),Attention and performance II (pp. 412–431). Amsterdam: North-Holland. (Original work published 1868 as Over de snelheid van psychische processen)
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., &O’hara, W.P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 165–168.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processingin visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Frith, C. D., &Done, D. J. (1986). Routes to action in reaction time tasks.Psychological Research,48, 169–177.
Giray, M. (1990).Über die Aktivierung der menschlichen Motorik: Theoretische und experimentelle Analysen bei Reaktionsaufgaben [On the activation of the human motor system: A theoretical and experimental analysis of RT tasks]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen.
Giray, M., &Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1278–1291.
Gopher, D., &Sanders, A. F. (1984). S-Oh-R: Oh stages! Oh resources! In W. Prinz & A. F Sanders (Eds.),Cognition and motor behavior (pp. 231–253). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Graham, F. K., &Hackley, S. A. (1991). Passive attention and generalized orienting. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 253–299). New York: Wiley.
Hackley, S. A., &Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction time task.Nature,391, 786–788.
Hildreth, J. D. (1979). Bloch ’s law and a Poisson counting model for simple reaction time to light.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 153–162.
Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., &Jaroszyk, F. (1994). The relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time, and stimulus intensity.Psychological Research,56, 59–65.
Jaśkowski, P., Rybarczyk, K., Jaroszyk, F., &Lemański, D. (1995). The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans.Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis,55, 57–64.
Jaśkowski, P., &Verleger, R. (1993). A clock paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force.Perceptual& Motor Skills,77, 163–174.
Jaśkowski, P., Verleger, R., &Wäscher, E. (1994). Response force and reaction time in asimple reaction task under time pressure.Zeitschrift für Psychologic202, 405–413.
Jaśkowski, P., Wroblewski, M., &Hojan-Jezierska, D. (1994). Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task.Perceptual & Motor Skills,79, 995–1002.
Keuss, P. J. G. (1972). Reaction time to the second of two shortly spaced auditory signals both varying in intensity.Acta Psychologica,36, 226–238.
Keuss, P. J. G., &Van der Molen, M. W. (1982). Positive and negative effects of stimulus intensity in auditory reaction tasks: Further studies on immediate arousal.Acta Psychologica,52, 61–72.
Kohfeld, D. L. (1971). Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound.Journal of Experimental Psychology,88, 251–257.
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., &Osman, A. M. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—A model and taxonomy.Psychological Review,97, 253–270.
Kramer, A., &Spinks, J. (1991 ). Capacity views of human information processing. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 179–249). New York: Wiley.
Levick, W. R. (1973). Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells.Vision Research,13, 837–853.
Liu, Y. (1996). Queueing network modeling of elementary mental processes.Psychological Review,103, 116–136.
Mattes, S., &Ulrich, R. (1997). Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1089–1097.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: A framework for analyzing processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.
Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Pfaff, K. (1991, November).Visual stimulus intensity does not influence response force. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.
Molenaar, P. C. M., &Van der Molen, M. W. (1986). Steps to a formal analysis of the cognitive-energetic model of stress and human performance.Acta Psychologica,62, 237–261.
Mordkoff, J. T., Miller, J. O., &Roch, A. C. (1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 25–41.
Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement?Psychological Review,80, 489–509.
Niemi, P., &Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,89, 133–162.
Nissen, M. J. (1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing.Perception& Psychophysics,22, 338–352.
Öhman, A. (1987). The psychophysiology of emotion: An evolutionary cognitive perspective. In P. K. Akles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 2, pp. 79–127). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Requin, J., Brener, J., &Ring, C. (1991 ). Preparation for action. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and autonomic nervous system approaches (pp. 357–448). New York: Wiley.
Romaiguere, P., Hasbroucq, T., Possamai, C. A., &Seal, J. (1993). Intensity to force translation: A new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 197–201.
Sanders, A. F. (1975). The foreperiod effect revisited.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 591–598.
Sanders, A. F. (1977). Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance.Acta Psychologica,53, 61–97.
Sanders, A. F., &Andriessen, J. E. B. (1978). A suppressing effect of response selection on immediate arousal in a choice reaction task.Acta Psychologica,42, 181–186.
Scheirs, J. G. M., &Brunia, C. H. M. (1982). Effects of stimulus and task factors on Achilles tendon reflexes evoked early during a preparatory period.Physiology & Behavior,28, 681–685.
Schweickert, R., &Townsend, J. T. (1989). A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 328–347.
Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time.Psychological Review,102, 567–593.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Steyvers, F.J. J. M. (1987). The influence of sleep deprivation and knowledge of results on perceptual encoding.Acta Psychologica,66, 173–187.
Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1983).The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, J. T., &Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,39, 321–359.
Townsend, J. T., &Schweickert, R. (1989). Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: Laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 309–327.
Trumbo, D. A., &Gaillard, A. W. K. (1975). Drugs, time uncertainty, signal modality, and reaction time. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds.),Attention and Performance V(pp. 441–454). New York: Academic Press.
Ulrich, R., &Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—Good news for bad clocks.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,42, 1–12.
Ulrich, R., &Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 972–990.
Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., &Miller, J. O. (1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 915–928.
Ulrich, R., &Stapf, K. H. (1984). A double-response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 545–558.
Valle-Inclan, F., &Hackley, S. A. (1997). Accessory stimulus and response selection effects on the lateralized readiness potential (LRP).Psychophysiology,33, S92.
Van Der Molen, M. W., &Orlebeke, J. F. (1980). Phasic heart rate change and the U-shaped relationship between choice reaction time and auditory signal intensity.Psychophysiology,17, 471–481.
Van Duren, L. L., &Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs.Acta Psychologica,69, 83–94.
Vaughan, H. G., Jr.,Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.Vision Research,6, 654–656.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH-40733, by Otago Research Grant MFU-B75, by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (UL-88/103), and by cooperative research funds from the Deutsche Raum- und Luftfahrtgesellschaft e.V. and the New Zealand Ministry of Research, Science, and Technology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, J., Franz, V. & Ulrich, R. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 107–119 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211952
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211952