The perception of consonant clusters that are phonotactically illegal word initially in English (e.g., /tl/, /sr/) was investigated to determine whether listeners’ phonological knowledge of the language influences speech processing. Experiment 1 examined whether the phonotactic context effect (Massaro & Cohen, 1983), a bias toward hearing illegal sequences (e.g., /tl/) as legal (e.g., /tr/), is more likely due to knowledge of the legal phoneme combinations in English or to a frequency effect. In Experiment 2, Experiment 1 was repeated with the clusters occurring word medially to assess whether phonotactic rules of syllabification modulate the phonotactic effect. Experiment 3 examined whether vowel epenthesis, another phonological process, might also affect listeners’ perception of illegal sequences as legal by biasing them to hear a vowel between the consonants of the cluster (e.g., /talee/). Results suggest that knowledge of the phonotactically permissible sequences in English can affect phoneme processing in multiple ways.
Altman, G. T. M., Garnham, A., &Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 685–712.
Boland, J. E. (1997). Resolving syntactic category ambiguities in discourse context: Probabilistic and discourse constraints.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 588–615.
Boland, J. E., &Cutler, A. (1996). Interaction with autonomy: Multiple output models and the inadequacy of the great divide.Cognition,58, 309–320.
Brown, R. W., &Hildum, D. C. (1956). Expectancy and the perception of syllables.Language,32, 411–419.
Church, K. W. (1987a). Phonological parsing and lexical retrieval. In U H. Frauenfelder & L. Komisarjevsky Tyler (Eds.),Spoken word recognition (pp. 53–69). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Church, K. W. (1987b).Phonological parsing in speech recognition. Boston: Kluwer.
Connine, C. M. (1987). Constraints on interactive processes in auditory word recognition: The role of sentence context.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 527–538.
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., &Wang, J. (1994). Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: Multiple lexical activation, individual differences, and the role of sentence context.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 624–636.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., &Segui, J. (1987). Phoneme identification and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,19, 141–177.
Cutting, J. E. (1975). Aspects of phonological fusion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,104, 105–120.
Cutting, J. E., &Day, R. S. (1975). The perception of stop-liquid clusters in phonological fusion.Journal of Phonetics,3, 99–113.
Flege, J. E., &Wang, C. (1989). Native-languagephonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English Itl-ldl contrast.Journal of Phonetics,17, 299–315.
Frauenfelder, U. H., &Lahiri, A. (1989). Understanding words and word recognition: Does phonology help? In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (pp. 319–341). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frazier, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition. In U. H. Frauenfelder & L. Komisarjevsky Tyler (Eds.),Spoken word recognition (pp. 158–187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gaskell, M. G., Hare, M., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). A connectionist modelof phonological representation in speech perception.Cognitive Science,19, 407–439.
Gaskell, M. G., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 144–158.
Halle, P. A., Segui, J., Frauenfelder, U., &Meunier, C. (1998). The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 592–608.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1995). Language acquisition: Speech sounds and the beginnings of phonology. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 11. Speech, language, and communication (pp. 362–301). San Diego: Academic Press.
Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M., Svenkerud, V. Y, &Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 402–420.
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., &Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 630–645.
Klatt, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,67, 971–995.
Kucera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lahiri, A., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.Cognition,38, 245–294.
Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., &Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122–147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Macdonald, M. C, Pearlmutter, N. J., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution.Psychological Review,101, 676–703.
Mann, V. A., &Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 548–558.
Massaro, D. W. (1987).Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychologicalinquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,21, 398–421.
Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. M. (1983). Phonological context in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 338–348.
Mcclelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context onperception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 1–44.
Mcclelland, J. L., &Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology,18, 1–86.
Mcgurk, H., &Macdonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature,264, 746–748.
Mcqueen, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality inword-final ambiguity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 433–443.
Newman, R. S., Sawusch, J. R., &Luce, P. A. (1997). Lexicalneighborhood effects in phonetic processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 873–889.
Newman, R. S., Sawusch, J. R., & Luce, P. A. (in press). Underspecification and phoneme frequency in speech perception. InPapers in laboratory phonology (Vol. 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pitt, M. A., &Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 699–725.
Pitt, M. A., &Samuel, A. G. (1995). Lexical and sublexical feedback in auditory word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,29, 149–188.
Repp, B. H., &Mann, V. A. (1981). Perceptual assessment of fricativestop coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 1154–1163.
Samuel, A. G. (1981). Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 474–494.
Samuel, A. G. (1986). The role of the lexicon in speech perception. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.),Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Speech perception (Vol.1, pp. 89–112). New York: Academic Press.
Samuel, A. G. (1989). Insights from a failure of selective adaptation: Syllable-initialand syllable-final consonants are different.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 485–493.
Samuel, A. G. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restorationof phonemes?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 28–51.
Samuel, A. G., &Kat, D. (1996). Early levels of analysis of speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 676–694.
Steriade, D. (1995). Underspecification and markedness. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.),The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 114–174). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Takagi, N., &Mann, V. (1994). A perceptual basis for the systematic phonological correspondences between Japanese loan words and their English source words.Journal of Phonetics,22, 343–356.
Treiman, R. (1989). The internal structure of the syllable. In G. Carlson & M. Tannenhaus (Eds.),Linguistic structure in language processing (pp.27–52). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Treiman, R., &Danis, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 87–104.
Treiman, R., Gross, J., &Cwikiel-Glavin, A. (1992). The syllabification of Is/ clusters in English.Journal of Phonetics,20, 383–402.
Treiman, R., &Zukowski, A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 66–85.
Tyler, L. K., &Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes.Perception & Psvchophysics,34, 409–420.
Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word recognition.Cognition,32, 25–64.
This research was supported by Grant R29-DC01774 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
About this article
Cite this article
Pitt, M.A. Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 941–951 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211930
- Speech Perception
- Consonant Cluster
- Phoneme Identification
- Phonological Knowledge
- Syllable Onset