Abstract
When subjects are asked to identify a letter target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, the detection of a subsequent letter probe is briefly impaired. This transient deficit in probe detection, termed the “attentional blink,” depends on the type of item that immediately follows the letter target (Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1995). Two models have been proposed to account for this effect. The interference model of the attentional blink predicts that visual similarity between the probe and item immediately following the target (+1 item) causes the attentional blink, whereas the two-stage model is based on the notion that increased time needed to process the target letter causes the attentional blink. In order to test between these two possibilities, the masking properties of the +1 item and its similarity to the probe were varied. We found the attentional blink when the +1 item acted as a mask of the target, even though the +1 item and the probe were visually dissimilar. This pattern of results supports the two-stage model of the attentional blink.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battersby, W. S., &Wagman, I. H. (1962). Neural limitations of visual excitability: IV.American Journal of Physiology,203, 359–365.
Breitmeyer, B. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Ghirardelli, T. G., Grandison, T. D., &Egeth, H. E. (1995). Post-target masking and the attentional blink.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,36(Suppl.), 1751.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 653–662.
Seiffert, A. E., & DiLollo, V. (in press). Low-level masking in the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.
Sternberg, S. (1967). Two operations in character recognition: Some evidence from reaction-time measurements.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 45–53.
Weichselgartner, E., &Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of controlled visual attention.Science,238, 778–780.
White, C. W., &Lorber, C. M. (1976). Spatial-frequency specificity in visual masking.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 281–284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant SBR-9319356 awarded to H.E.E.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grandison, T.D., Ghirardelli, T.G. & Egeth, H.E. Beyond similarity: Masking of the target is sufficient to cause the attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 266–274 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211894
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211894