Abstract
This study examined whether a change in the amount of attention equally allocated to two locations affects judgments of the simultaneity or successiveness of stimuli presented at those locations. Observers were cued to expect two brief flashes either to the left and right of fixation or above and below fixation. Stimulus onset asynchrony was randomly varied. On a small proportion of trials, the stimuli appeared at the unexpected locations. Observers were more likely to report the stimuli as simultaneous when they appeared in the unexpected locations. A model proposed to account for the data assumes that a brief stimulus event is represented by a probability distribution reflecting the uncertainty in determining the time of the event’s occurrence, and two events are judged to be simultaneous if they are perceived to fall within some critical temporal interval, c, which is a function of the amount of attention allocated to the task.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan, L. G. (1975). The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order.Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 29–36.
Boring, E. G. (1950).A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Carver, R., & Brown, V. (1997).Combined effects of directed attention and differential luminance on judgments of simultaneity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Groner, M. T., Bischof, W. F., &DiLollo, V. (1989). A model of visible persistence and temporal integration.Spatial Vision,3, 293–304.
Hikosaka, O., Miyauchi, S., &Shimojo, S. (1993). Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.Vision Research,33, 1219–1240.
James, W. (1890).Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
Jaskowski, P. (1991). Two-stage model for order discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 76–82.
Roufs, J. A. (1963). Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance.Vision Research,3, 81–91.
Roufs, J. A., &Blommaert, F. J. J. (1981). Temporal impulse and step responses of the human eye obtained psychophysically by means of a drift-correcting perturbation technique.Vision Research,21, 1203–1221.
Sekuler, R., Tynan, P., &Levinson, E. (1973). Visual temporal order: A new illusion.Science,180, 210–212.
Stelmach, L. B., &Herdman, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 539–550.
Sternberg, S., &Knoll, R. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance IV (pp. 629–685). New York: Academic Press.
Ulrich, R. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 224–239.
Wolfram, S. (1993).Mathematica: A system for doing mathematics by computer (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carver, R.A., Brown, V. Effects of amount of attention allocated to the location of visual stimulus pairs on perception of simultaneity. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 534–542 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211862
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211862