Abstract
An information processing account of perception seeks to delineate the stages of processing through which a stimulus passes and determine the properties of the representation at each stage. Research in phonetic perception has identified two stages, the second of which is thought to encode abstract acoustic attributes of sounds. The present study provided a further test of this proposal by assessing whether nonphonetic stimuli could yield results similar to those obtained with phonetic stimuli. Five selective adaptation experiments were carried out with a trumpet—piano timbre continuum. Two manipulations were used to measure abstract encoding: cross-ear presentation of adaptor and test series, and the use of adaptors that were acoustically different from the continuum endpoints. The results provide evidence for an abstract representation of timbre. The similarity of the findings to those in the phonetic adaptation literature is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ades, A. E. (1974). How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 61–66.
Backus, J. (1977).The acoustical foundations of music. New York: Norton.
Benade, A. H. (1976).Fundamentals of musical acoustics. London: Oxford University Press.
Berger, K.W. (1964). Some factors in the recognition of timbre.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 1888–1891.
Blakemore, C., &Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: A new aftereffect.Science,166, 245–257.
Bricker, P., &Pruzansky, S. (1976). Speaker recognition. In N. Lass (Ed.),Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 295–326). New York: Academic Press.
Charbonneau, G. R. (1981). Timbre and the perceptual effects of three types of data reduction.Computer Music Journal,5, 10–19.
Cutting, J. E., Rosner, B. S., &Foard, C. F. (1976). Perceptual categories for musiclike sounds: Implications for theories of speech perception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 361–378.
Diehl, R. (1976). Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimension stop vs. continuant.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 267–272.
Diehl, R. (1981). Feature detectors for speech: A critical reappraisal.Psychological Bulletin,89, 1–18.
Eimas, P. D., Cooper, W. E., &Corbit, J. D. (1973). Some properties of linguistic feature detectors.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 247–252.
Eimas, P. D., &Corbit, J. D. (1973). Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology,4, 99–109.
Eimas, P. D., &Miller, J. L. (1978). Effects of selective adaptation of speech and visual patterns: Evidence for feature detectors. In H. L. Pick & R. D. Walk (Eds.),Perception and experience (pp. 307–345). New York: Plenum.
Ganong, W. E., III (1978). The selective adaptation effects of burstcued stops.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 71–83.
Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 1270–1277.
Grey, J. M. (1978). Timbre discrimination in musical patterns.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,64, 467–472.
Grey, J. M., &Moorer, J. A. (1977). Perceptual evaluation of synthesized musical instrument tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 454–462.
Hall, M. D., & Pastore, R. E. (1993, November).An auditory analogue to feature integration. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hecker, M. (1971). Speaker recognition.American Speech and Hearing Association Monographs,16, 24–49.
Iverson, P., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1993). Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,95, 2595–2603.
Jamieson, D. G., &Cheesman, M. F. (1986). The locus of selective adaptation in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 286–294.
Johnson, K. (1990). The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 642–654.
Kat, D., &Samuel, A. G. (1984). More adaptation of speech by nonspeech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 512–525.
Kendall, R. A. (1986). The role of acoustic signal partitions in listener categorization of musical phrases.Music Perception,4, 185–214.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &Studdert-Kennedy,M. (1967). Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review,74, 431–461.
Liberman, A. M., &Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised.Cognition,21, 1–36.
Moore, F. R. (1990).Elements of computer music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Moore, F. R. (1993).The cmusic sound synthesis program [Computer program]. La Jolla, CA: Computer Audio Research Laboratory, Center for Music Experimentation, University of California at San Diego.
Mullennix, J. W., &Pisoni, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 379- 390.
Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., &Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 365–378.
Nearey, T. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,85, 2088–2113.
Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., &Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process.Psychological Science,5, 42–46.
Opolko, F., &Wapnick, J. (Producers). (1987).McGill University master samples [Compact disk]. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University.
Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., &Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 309–328.
Pitt, M. A. (in press). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Pitt, M. A., &Samuel, A. G. (1993). An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 699–725.
Portnoff, M. R. (1976). Implementation of the digital phase vocoder using the fast Fourier transform.IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing,ASSP-24, 243–248.
Remez, R. E. (1979). Adaptation of the category boundary between speech and nonspeech: A case against feature detectors.Cognitive Psychology,11, 38–57.
Remez, R. E. (1980). Susceptibility of a stop consonant to adaptation on a speech-nonspeech continuum: Further evidence against feature detectors in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 17–23.
Remez, R. E. (1987). Neural models of speech perception: A case history. In S. Harnad (Ed.),Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 199–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Remez, R. E., Cutting, J. E., &Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1980). Cross-series adaptation using song and string.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 524–530.
Roberts, M., &Summerfield, Q. (1981). Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 309–314.
Saldanha, E. L., &Corso, J. F. (1964). Timbre cues and the identification of musical instruments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 2021–2026.
Samuel, A. G. (1986). Red herring detectors and speech perception: In defense of selective adaptation.Cognitive Psychology,18, 452–499.
Samuel, A. G. (1988). Central and peripheral representation of whispered and voiced speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 379–388.
Samuel, A. G., & Kat, D. (1994).Levels of analysis of speech and other complex sounds. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Samuel, A. G., &Newport, E. L. (1979). Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 563–578.
Sawusch, J. (1977). Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 738–750.
Sawusch, J. R. (1986). Auditory and phonetic coding of speech. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.),Pattern recognition by humans and machines (pp. 51–88). New York: Academic Press.
Sawusch, J. R., &Jusczyk, P. (1981). Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 408–421.
Slawson, A. W. (1967). Vowel quality and musical timbre as functions of spectrum envelope and fundamental frequency.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,43, 87–101.
Sussman, J. E. (1993). Focused attention during selective adaptation along a place of articulation continuum.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,93, 488–498.
Van Lancker, D., Kreiman, J., &Emmorey, K. (1985). Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters: Part I. Recognition of backward voices.Journal of Phonetics,13, 19–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant R29 DC01774 from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pitt, M.A. Evidence for a central representation of instrument timbre. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 43–55 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211849
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211849