Abstract
Do deeper levels of processing produce equivalent priming effects at all stages of task performance? In Experiment 1, we varied the level of processing factorially across two task stages—target selection and response selection. Each stage required perceptual (e.g., color) or conceptual (e.g., friendliness) processing of stimulus items (i.e., animal names). Negative priming was substantially greater when deeper processing was required at thetarget selection stage, but it was unaffected by the level of processing at the response selection stage. In contrast, positive priming was greater when deeper processing was required at theresponse selection stage, but it was unaffected by processing at the target selection stage. In Experiment 2, we generalized this finding using a task in which numeric targets were selected on the basis of their parity. As in Experiment 1, the deeper level of processing at the target selection stage produced a larger negative priming effect. These results illuminate the role of target selection demands in modulating the strength of negative priming.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., &Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 107–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). Psyscope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Fox, E. (1995) Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 145–173.
Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., &Kellogg, W. A. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.Memory & Cognition,11, 366–373.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Shore, D. I. (1996). Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model.Visual Cognition,3, 119–164.
Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association.Memory & Cognition,9, 587–598.
MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., &Seergobin, K. N. (1999). Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it.Memory & Cognition,27, 197–207.
Malley, G. B., &Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 657–667.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., &Hasher L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin,118, 35–54.
Milliken, B., &Joordens, S. (1996). Negative priming without overt prime selection.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 333–346.
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P., &Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: A re-evaluation of the implications of negative priming.Psychological Review,105, 203–229.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 444–450.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1291–1305.
Neill, W. T., &Kahan, T. A. (1999). Response conflict reverses priming: A replication.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 304–308.
Neill, W. T., Lissner, L. S., &Beck, J. L. (1990). Negative priming insame-different matching: Further evidence for a central locus of inhibition.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 398–400.
Neill, W. T., &Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1–44). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neill, W. T., &Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 565–576.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., &Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of attention. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., &Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 993–1000.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., &Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 591–611.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 809–840.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Milliken, B. (1995). Spatial negative priming without mismatching: Comment on Part and Kanwisher (1994).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1220–1229.
Wood, T. J., &Milliken, B. (1998). Negative priming without ignoring.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 470–475.
Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 127–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yee, P.L., Santoro, K.E., Grey, A.L. et al. Deeper processing at target selection increases the magnitude of negative priming. Memory & Cognition 28, 1429–1436 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211843
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211843