Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated how readers use information about temporal and spatial distance to focus attention on the more important parts of the situation model that they create during narrative comprehension. Effects of spatial distance were measured by testing the accessibility in memory of objects and rooms located at differing distances from the protagonist’s current location. Before the test probe, an intervening episode was inserted in the narrative. Story time distance was manipulated by stating that the intervening episode lasted for either minutes or hours. Discourse time—that is, time spent reading from prime to test—was manipulated by describing the intervening episode either briefly or at length. Clear effects of story time distance and spatial distance on accessibility were found, whereas discourse time distance did not affect accessibility. The results are interpreted as supporting constructionist theories of text comprehension.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Refereces
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., &Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronomial antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 427–440.
Bestgen, Y., &Vonk, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing.Discourse Processes,19, 385–406.
Bower, G. H., &Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension.Science,247, 44–48.
Bower, G. H., &Rinck, M. (1999a). Goals as generators of activation in narrative understanding. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.),Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 111–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bower, G. H., &Rinck, M. (1999b). Priming access to entities in mental models. In W. Hacker & M. Rinck (Eds.),Proceedings of the 41st Congress of the German Psychological Association in Dresden, 1998 (pp. 74–85). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers.
Bower, G. H., & Rinck, M. (in press). Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Carreiras, M., Carriedo, N., Alonso, M. A., &Fernández, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading.Memory & Cognition,25, 438–446.
Chafe, W. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of language. In T. Givón (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 159–181). New York: Academic Press.
Chatman, S. (1978).Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 266–275.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dowty, D. R. (1986). The effects of aspectual class on temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?Linguistics & Philosophy,9, 37–61.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990).Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions.Linguistics,30, 5–55.
Glenberg, A. M., &Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 129–151.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., &Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 163–189.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
Haenggi, D., Gernsbacher, M. A., &Bolliger, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in situation-based inferencing during narrative text comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.),Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 79–96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.),Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kintsch, W. (1998).Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Langston, M. C., &Trabasso, T. (1999). Modeling causal integration and availability of information during comprehension of narrative texts. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.),The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 29–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Langston, M. C., Trabasso, T., &Magliano, J. P. (1998). A connectionist model of narrative comprehension. In A. Ram & K. Moorman (Eds.).Computational models of reading and understanding (pp. 181–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mandler, J. M. (1986). On the comprehension of temporal order.Language & Cognitive Processes,1, 309–320.
Morrow, D. G. (1994). Spatial models created from text. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.),Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 57–78). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., &Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 292–312.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., &Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 165–187.
Ohtsuka, K., &Brewer, W. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narratives.Discourse Processes,15, 317–336.
Rinck, M. (1994).Treatment of outliers in reaction time data. Unpublished manuscript. Technical University of Dresden.
Rinck, M., &Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 110–131.
Rinck, M., Bower, G. H., &Wolf, K. (1998). Distance effects in surface structures and situation models.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 221–246.
Rinck, M., Höhnel, A., Bower, G. H., &Glowalla, U. (1997). The metrics of spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 622–637.
Rinck, M., Williams, P., Bower, G. H., &Becker, E. S. (1996). Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions.Discourse Processes,21, 23–55.
Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 421–441.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 545–569.
van Dijk, T. A., &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (1998).RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOS (Version 4) [Online]. Available: psych.umb.edu/ rsvp/ [1998, October 27].
Wilson, S. G., Rinck, M., McNamara, T. P., Bower, G. H., &Morrow, D. G. (1993). Mental models and narrative comprehension: Some qualifications.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 141–154.
Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1196–1207.
Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An eventindexing model.Psychological Science,6, 292–297.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., &Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 386–397.
Zwaan, R. A., &Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory.Psychological Bulletin,123, 162–185.
Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., &Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,2, 199–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Preparation of this paper was supported by Grant Ri 600/3-3 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to M.R., and by NIMH Grant 1R37-MH-47575 to G.H.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rinck, M., Bower, G.H. Temporal and spatial distance in situation models. Memory & Cognition 28, 1310–1320 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211832
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211832