Abstract
The temporal relations among candidate causes were studied in a causal induction task using a design that is known to produce occasion setting in animal learning preparations. For some subset of the observations, one event, the occasion setter, was accompanied by another event, the conditional cause; for another subset of the observations, the conditional cause occurred alone. The efficacy of the conditional cause depended on whether it was or was not accompanied by the occasion setter. Participants used the occasion setter to modulate their effect expectancy to the conditional cause when the events were presented serially, but not simultaneously. Current causal induction models are unable to account for the full range of effects that we observed; the relative roles of time, attention, and cue distinctiveness are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alloy, L. B., &Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information.Psychological Review,91, 112–149.
Ausubel, D. P., &Schiff, H. M. (1954). The effect of incidental and experimentally induced experience in the learning of relevant and irrelevant causal relationships by children.Journal of Genetic Psychology,84, 109–123.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1971). The role of familiarity in children’s explanations of physical causality.Child Development,42, 705–715.
Brandon, S. E., &Wagner, A. R. (1998). Occasion setting: Influences of conditioned emotional responses and configural cues. In N. A. Schmajuk & P. C. Holland (Eds.),Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 343–382). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cheng, P. W. (1993). Separating causal laws from causal facts: Pressing the limits of statistical relevance. In D. L Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 30, pp. 215–264). San Diego: Academic Press.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review,104, 367–405.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Dickinson, A., &Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 60–80.
Gilovich, T. (1991).How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 183–206). New York: Ballinger.
Holland, P. C. (1986). Temporal determinants of occasion setting in feature-positive discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior,14, 111–120.
Holland, P. C. (1989a). Acquisition and transfer of conditional discrimination performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 154–165.
Holland, P. C. (1989b). Feature extinction enhances transfer of occasion setting.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 269–279.
Holland, P. C. (1989c). Occasion setting with simultaneous com pounds in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 183–193.
Holland, P. C. (1991a). Acquisition and transfer of occasion setting in operant feature positive and feature negative discriminations.Learning & Motivation,22, 366–387.
Holland, P. C. (1991b). Transfer of control in ambiguous discriminations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 231–248.
Holland, P. C. (1995). The effects of intertrial and feature—target intervals on operant serial feature-positive discrimination learning.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 411–428.
Holland, P. C. (1999). Intertrial interval effects in Pavlovian serial feature positive discriminations.Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 127–139.
Holland, P. C., &Morell, J. R. (1996). The effects of intertrial and feature-target intervals on operant serial feature negative discrimination learning.Learning & Motivation,27, 21–42.
Holland, P. C., &Reeve, C. E. (1991). Acquisition and transfer of control by an ambiguous cue.Animal Learning & Behavior,19, 113–124.
Hume, D. (1955). An inquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1748)
Nakajima, S. (1992). The effect of temporal relationship of stimulus compound on ambiguous discrimination in the pigeon’s autoshaping.Behavioural Processes,27, 65–73.
Nisbett, R. E., &Ross, L. (1980).Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Reed, P. (1992). Effect of a signalled delay between an action and outcome on human judgement of causality.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44B, 81–100.
Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rescorla, R. A., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Schmajuk, N. A., Lamoureux, J. A., &Holland, P. C. (1998). Occasion setting: A neural network approach.Psychological Review,105, 3–32.
Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37B, 1–21.
Shanks, D. R. (1989). Selectional processes in causality judgment.Memory & Cognition,17, 27–34.
Shanks, D. R., &Darby, R. J. (1998). Feature- and rule-based generalization in human associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 405–415.
Shanks, D. R., Darby, R. J., &Charles, D. (1998). Resistance to interference in human associative learning: Evidence of configural processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 136–150.
Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., &Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality by human subjects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41B, 139–159.
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,119, 3–22.
Swartzentruber, D. (1998). Perspectives on modulation: Modulatorand target-focused views. In N. A. Schmajuk & P. C. Holland (Eds.),Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 167–197). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Thomson, D. M., &Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 255–262.
Van Hamme, L. J., &Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements.Learning & Motivation,25, 127–151.
Waldmann, M. R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 222–236.
Wasserman, E. A., &Berglan, L. R. (1998). Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgment: The role of within-compound associations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51B, 121–138.
Wasserman, E. A., &Neunaber, D. J. (1986). College students’ responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,46, 15–35.
Williams, D. A., Sagness, K. E., &McPhee, J. E. (1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 694–709.
Young, M. E. (1995). On the origin of personal causal theories.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 83–104.
Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (dy1998). [The effect of delay interval on occasion setting]. Unpublished raw data.
Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., &Johnson, J. L., &Jones, F. L. (2000). Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53B, 121–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The data in Experiment 1 were presented at the 1997 meeting of the Psychonomic Society, and the data in Experiments 1 and 2 were presented at the 1999 Special Interest Meeting on Cue Competition in Associative Learning, Ardennes, Belgium.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Young, M.E., Johnson, J.L. & Wasserman, E.A. Serial causation: Occasion setting in a causal induction task. Memory & Cognition 28, 1213–1230 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211822
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211822