Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated the influence of word frequency in speeded word naming and in a relatively novel regularization task in which participants were required to pronounce words on the basis of spelling-to-sound correspondences instead of giving their normal pronunciations (e.g., pronouncepint so that it rhymes withhint). Participants were presented high- and low-frequency regular words and exception words, along with a set of nonwords. The results indicated that there was a normal word frequency effect (i.e., high-frequency words faster than low-frequency words) in the standard speeded naming task, whereas, for the regularization task, the word frequency effect was reversed for regular words, even though the regular words were pronounced in an identical fashion in both the normal naming and the regularization tasks. This reversal of the word frequency effect was not obtained for the exception words. The discussion focuses on the implication of these results for attentional control models of lexical processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?Memory & Cognition,10, 565–575.
Balota, D. A., &Ferraro, F. R. (1996). A dissociation of frequency and regularity effects in pronunciation performance across young adults, older adults and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 573–592.
Balota, D. A., &Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word-frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 32–55.
Balota, D. A., Paul, S. T., &Spieler, D. H. (1999). Attentional control of lexical processing pathways during word recognition and reading. In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.),Language processing (pp. 15–57). London: Psychology Press.
Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Cexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies in information processing (pp. 151–216). San Diego: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel distributed processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Frost, R., Katz, L., &Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 104–115.
Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task.Psychological Bulletin,109, 340–347.
Jared, D. (1997). Evidence that strategy effects in word recognition reflect changes in output timing rather than changes in processing route.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1424–1438.
Kanne, S. M., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Faust, M. E. (1998). Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland’s (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.Psychological Review,105, 174–187.
Kuçera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 331–353.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
Marshall, J. C., &Newcombe, F. (1980). The conceptual status of deep dyslexia: An historical perspective. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 1–21). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Braun, J. G., &Heathcote, A. (1992). Response time distributions and the Stroop task: A test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 872–882.
Midgley-West, L. (1979).Phonological encoding and subject strategies in skilled reading. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of London, Birbeck College.
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., &Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 452–467.
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Tallon, J., & Hill, J. (1989, January).Voluntary surface dyslexia: A new argument for two processes in oral reading? Paper presented at a meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society, London.
Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Paap, K. R., &Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race.Psychological Research,53, 13–24.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Shallice, M. S., &Warrington, E. K. (1980). Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 119–145). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Simpson, G. B., &Kang, H. (1994). The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 319–331.
Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., &Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 461–479.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1248–1268.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–661.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Tabossi, P., &Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory & Cognition,20, 303–313.
Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.
Zevin, J. D., &Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 121–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIA Grant AGO 3991.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balota, D.A., Law, M.B. & Zevin, J.D. The attentional control of lexical processing pathways: Reversing the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition 28, 1081–1089 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211809
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211809