Abstract
Experiments 1 and 2 of this study show that when the target is either a vertical or a horizontal line, diagonal-line flankers tilted 45° either to the right or to the left have the same effect as do incongruent flankers. When the target is a diagonal line tilted either to the right or to the left, vertical- or horizontal-line flankers do not have the same effect as do incongruent flankers. Experiment 3 demonstrates that this asymmetry is not caused by the temporal-dynamic aspects of the processing. Together, these experiments suggest that there is an asymmetrical relation between diagonal lines and either vertical or horizontal lines otttside of the central focus of attention. Experiment 4 shows that despite this asymmetry in the flanker task, visual search for a vertical- or a horizontal-line target among diagonal-line distractors is not affected by the number of distractors. Possible explanations of this phenomenon are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 891–901.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Sc Performance,11, 529–553.
Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 448–456.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149,
Eriksen, C. W., &Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of the target within the display impair processing?Perception & Psychophysics,26, 195–205.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 249–263.
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 278–286.
Estes, W. K. (1974). Redundancy of noise elements and signals in visual detection of letters.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 53–60.
Estes, W. K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 353–382.
Grice, G. R., &Gwynne, J. W. (1985). Temporal characteristics of noise conditions producing facilitation and interference.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 495–501.
Harms, L., &Bundesen, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 11–19.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
Kramer, A. F., Tham, M.-P., &Yeh, Y.-Y. (1991). Movement and focused attention: A failure to replicate.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 537–546.
Miller, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 419–434.
Miller, J. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 270–288.
O’hara, W. P. (1980). Evidence in support of word unitization.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 390–402.
O’hara, W., &Eriksen, C. W. (1979). Word unitization examined using an interference paradigm.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,14, 81–84.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,87, 127–190.
Townsend, J. T. (1976). Serial and within-stage independent parallel model equivalence on the minimum completion time.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,14, 219–239.
Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished.Psychological Science,1, 46–54.
Treisman, A. M., &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Tsal, Y., & Mevorach, L. (1991, November). Effects of attention on length and distance estimates. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Francisco.
Yantis, Y., &Johnston, J. C. (1990). On the locus of visual selection: Evidence from focused attention tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 135–149.
Yeh, Y.-Y., &Eriksen, C. W. (1984). Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 225–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by NSF Grant BNS-9012471.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, A., Shoup, R.E. Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 693–703 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211745
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211745