Abstract
In two experiments, subjects made pairs of lexical decisions verbally. In Experiment 1, masked stimuli appeared concurrently to the left and right of fixation; in Experiment 2, nonmasked stimuli appeared sequentially at fixation. The left-hand letter strings were judged more accurately in in Experiment 1, and the second letter strings were judged more accurately in Experiment 2. Each string in the pair could be either a word (e.g.,fork) or a nonword anagram (e.g.,frok). Consequently, the two strings in the pair could be related (e.g.,fork-spoon, frok-spoon, etc.) or unrelated (e.g.,fork-door, frok-door, etc.), independently of whether neither, either, or both strings were words. Semantically related stimuli induced consistent biases to respond “word,” as noted in other studies. These biases were typically stronger for the event reported second. Minimal evidence was found for perceptual priming effects. The asymmetrical effects were consistent with spreading-activation-type mechanisms, but other considerations support a multiple-process view.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agresti, A., &Yang, M. (1986). An empirical investigation of some effects of sparseness in contingency tables.Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,5, 9–21.
Antos, S. J. (1979). Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 527–545.
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80.
Bernstein, I. H., Bissonnette, V., Vyas, A., &Barclay, P. (1989). Semantic priming: Subliminal perception or context?Perception & Psychophysics,45, 153–161.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P. W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Briand, K., Den Heyer, K., &Dannebring, G. L. (1988). Retroactive semantic priming in a lexical decision task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 341–359.
Carr, T. H., Mccauley, C., Sperber, R. D., &Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 757–777.
Diener, D., &Smee, W. P. (1984). Apple tachistoscope.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 540–544.
Farah, M. J. (1989) Semantic and perceptual priming: How similar are the underlying mechanisms?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 188–194.
Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W., &Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review,63, 149–159
Garner, W. R., &Morton, J. (1969). Perceptual independence: Definitions, models, and experimental paradigms.Psychological Bulletin,72, 233–259.
Hines.D., Czerwtnski, M., Sawyer, P K., &Dwyer, M. (1986). Automatic semantic priming: Effect of category level and word association level.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 370–379.
Lupker, S. J., &Massaro, D. W. (1979). Selective perception without confounding contributions of decision and memory.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 60–69.
Marcel, A. J. (1980). Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII (pp. 435–457). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marcel, A J. (1983a). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,15, 197–237.
Marcel, A. J. (1983b). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processesCognitive Psychology,15, 238–300
McCifland, J. L., &Rumflhart, D. E. (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception Part I An account of basic findingsPsychological Review,88, 375–407.
Meyer, D. E., &Schvanfveidt, R. W. (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operationsJournal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234
Morion, J. (1969) Interaction of information in word recognitionPsychological Review,76, 165–178.
Muller, H. J., &Findiay, J. M. (1987) Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attentionPerception & Psychophysics,42, 383–399
Neely, J. H. (1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory. Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attentionJournal of Experimental Psychology General,106, 226–254
Neely, J. H. (in press) Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition A selective review of current findings and theories In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds ),Basic processes in reading Visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Norris, D. (1984). The mispriming effect Evidence of an orthographic check in the lexical decision taskMemory & Cognition,12, 470–476
O’connor, R. E., &Forster, K. I. (1981) Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognitionMemory & Cognition,9, 78–92
Oizak, L. A., &Wickens, T. D. (1983) The interpretation of detection data through direct multivariate frequency analysisPsychological Bulletin,93, 574–585
Rarchee, R., &Mckoon, G. (1988) A retrieval theory of priming in memoryPsychological Review,95, 385–408
SAS Institute, Inc. (1985a)SAS IML guide for personal computers, Version 6 edition Cary, NC. Author
SAS Institute, Inc. (1985b)SAS user’s guide Statistics, Version 5 edition, Cary, NC Author
Schvaneveidt, R. W., &Mcdonald, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysisJournal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,7, 673–687
Sionf, G. O., &van Orden, G. C. (1989) Are words represented by nodes?Memory & Cognition,17, 511–524
Wickens, T. D. (1989)Multiway contingency tables analysis for the social sciences Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Wickins, T. D. &Oizak, L. A. (1989) The statistical analysis of concurrent detection ratingsPerception & Psychophysics,45. 514–528
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernstein, I.H., Bissonnette, V. & Welch, K.R. Perceptual and response interactions in semantic priming. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 525–534 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211598
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211598