Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information

  • Published: May 1999
  • Volume 27, pages 438–453, (1999)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information
Download PDF
  • Angela D. Friederici1,
  • Karsten Steinhauer1 &
  • Stefan Frisch1 

  • 2348 Accesses

  • 169 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Both semantic and syntactic context constraints can influence word processing at the level of lexical integration. In event-related brain potentials (ERPs), semantic integration is reflected by a negativity around 400 msec (N400), whereas phrase structure assignment and syntactic integration are assumed to be reflected by an early left anterior negativity and a late positivity (P600), respectively. An ERP study is presented in which participants read different types of sentences whose terminal verb was either congruent with the preceding context or incongruent due to a phrase structure violation, a semantic violation, or both. The main finding was that only the pure semantic violation condition, but not the combined semantic and syntactic violation condition, elicited a large N400. The two conditions containing phrase structure violations were predominantly characterized by a P600. Both semantic violation conditions, moreover, displayed a late negativity around 700 msec that overlapped with the P600 in the double violation condition. The absence of an N400 effect for elements that are syntactically as well as semantically incongruent with prior context suggests an early influence of phrase structure information on processes of lexical-semantic integration. The present data are discussed in comparison to previous ERP findings, and a new view of lexical integration processes is proposed.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Multiple routes to word recognition: evidence from event-related potentials

Article 17 October 2019

Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential

Article 27 May 2015

Differences in spatiotemporal dynamics for processing specific semantic categories: An EEG study

Article Open access 30 December 2024
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., &Boland, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials.Journal of Memory & Language,38, 112–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, C. A. (1985). What do we really know about semantic context effects during reading? In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. McKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 125–169). Toronto: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials associated with semantic priming.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,60, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., &Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 774–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M., &Hagoort, P. (1993). The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: SSN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwilla, D. J., Brown, C. M., &Hagoort, P. (1995). The N400 as a function of the level of processing.Psychophysiology,32, 274–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., &Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review,82, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, S., King, J., &Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations.Language & Cognitive Processes,13, 21–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, W. (1982). Autonomy and interaction in the language processing system: A reply to Marslen-Wilson and Tyler.Cognition,12, 109–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., &Bentin, S. (1994). Attention mechanisms mediate the syntactic priming effect in auditory word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 595–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L., &McClelland, J. L. (1984). Speech as a cognitive process: The interactive activation model. In N. Lass (Ed.),Speech and language (Vol. 10, pp. 337–374). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D. J., &Speer, S. R. (1991). Global and local context effects in sentence processing. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 115–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., &Tyler, L. K. (1987). The process of spoken word recognition: An introduction.Cognition,25, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1987). Structure in auditory word recognition.Cognition,25, 157–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences.Cognitive Psychology,14, 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1985). Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics.Cognition,19, 133–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.Brain & Language,50, 259–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., &Mecklinger, A. (1996). The temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late ERP effects elicited by syntactic anomalies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., &Kilborn, K. (1989). Temporal constraints on language processing: Syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., &Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25, 157–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., &Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: Effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations.Cognitive Brain Research,1, 183–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D., &Saddy, D. (1993). Disorders of word class processing in aphasia. In G. Blanken, J. Dittmann, H. Grimm, J. C. Marshall, & C. W. Wallesch (Eds.),Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 169–181). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, S., & Friederici, A. D. (1998).Verb-argument structure processing: The influence of verb-specific and argument-specific constraints. Poster presented at the Eleventh Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New Brunswick, NJ.

  • Gorrell, P. (1995).Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., &Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics.Psychophysiology,34, 660–676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P., Brown, C., &Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 439–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahne, A., &Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halgren, E., &Smith, M. E. (1987). Cognitive evoked potentials as modulatory processes in human memory formation and retrieval.Human Neurobiology,6, 129–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, P. J., &Neville, H. (1990). Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 281–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, J. M., Bayer, J., Bader, M., &Meng, M. (1998). Eventrelated brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 264–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., &Feldt, L. A. (1970). Conditions under which square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association,65, 1582–1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M. (1997). Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures.Psychophysiology,34, 383–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., &Hillyard, St. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 203–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., &Hillyard, St. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.Nature,307, 161–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., Lindamood, T. E., &Hillyard, St.A. (1984). Word expectancy and event-related brain potentials during sentence processing. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.),Preparatory states and processes (pp. 217–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. (1988). Event-related potential studies of language. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 139–187). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1989). Access and integration: Projecting sound onto meaning. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.),Lexical representation and process (Vol. 1, pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., &Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.Cognition,8, 1–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R., &Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 495–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., &Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials.Memory & Cognition,23, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. M., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. C. (1989). Verb-guidance and other lexical effects in parsing.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 123–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., &Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münte, T. F., Matzke, M., &Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruencies in words and pseudo-words.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 318–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H., &Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H.-J., Mills, D. L., &Lawson, D. L. (1992). Fractionating language: Different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods.Cerebral Cortex,2, 244–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, H.-J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., &Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobre, A. C., &McCarthy, G. (1994). Language-related ERPs: Scalp distributions and modulations by word type and semantic priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,6, 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition.Cognition,22, 93–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, W., Dobrovolsky, M., &Aronoff, M. (1989).Contemporary linguistics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1989). The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1997). Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 807–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 785–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., &Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 786–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout, L., &Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 739–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., &McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory.Psychological Review,95, 385–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Carlson, M., &Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 657–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rösler, F., Friederici, A. D., Pütz, P., &Hahne, A. (1993). Eventrelated brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words.Memory & Cognition,18, 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., &Rose, U. (1998). Context effects in visual word recognition: Lexical relatedness and syntactic context.Memory & Cognition,26, 1292–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations? In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.),Natural language parsing: Psychological, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 359–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., &Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., &Kello, C. (1993). Verbspecific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 528–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 485–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., &Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.Memory & Cognition,18, 380–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., &Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open-closed-class words.Memory & Cognition,19, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.Memory & Cognition,14, 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B., &Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure.Memory & Cognition,12, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.Cognition,32, 25–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, P.O. Box 500 355, 04303, Leipzig, Germany

    Angela D. Friederici, Karsten Steinhauer & Stefan Frisch

Authors
  1. Angela D. Friederici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karsten Steinhauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Frisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela D. Friederici.

Additional information

The work reported was supported by the Leibniz Science Prize, awarded to A.D.F., and by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG FR 519/12-2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K. & Frisch, S. Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory & Cognition 27, 438–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211539

Download citation

  • Received: 02 September 1997

  • Accepted: 19 May 1998

  • Issue Date: May 1999

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211539

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • N400 Amplitude
  • Critical Word
  • Word Category
  • Violation Condition
  • Semantic Integration
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature