Abstract
A semantic relatedness decision task was used to investigate whether phonological recoding occurs automatically and whether it mediates lexical access in visual word recognition and reading. In this task, subjects read a pair of words and decided whether they were related or unrelated in meaning. In Experiment 1, unrelated word-homophone pairs (e.g., LION-BARE) and their visual controls (e.g., LION-BEAN) as well as related word pairs (e.g., FISH-NET) were presented. Homophone pairs were more likely to be judged as related or more slowly rejected as unrelated than their control pairs, suggesting phonological access of word meanings. In Experiment 2, word-pseudohomophone pairs (e.g., TABLE-CHARE) and their visual controls (e.g., TABLE-CHARK) as well as related and unrelated word pairs were presented. Pseudohomophone pairs were more likely to be judged as related or more slowly rejected as unrelated than their control pairs, again suggesting automatic phonological recoding in reading.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Banks, W. P., Oka, E., &Shugarman, S. (1981). Recoding of printed words to internal speech: Does recoding come before lexical access? In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 137–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 241–246.
Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 556–566.
Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.
Carr, T. H., Davidson, B. J., &Hawkins, H. L. (1978). Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 674–690.
Carr, T. H., &Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1–82). New York: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). New York: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.
Coltheart, V., Laxon, V., Rickard, M., &Elton, C. (1988). Phonological recoding in reading for meaning by adults and children.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 387–397.
Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., &Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 917–955.
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition,6, 391–402.
Doctor, E. A., &Coltheart, M. (1980). Children’s use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition,8, 195–209.
Fleming, K. K. (1993). Phonologically mediated priming in spoken and printed word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 272–284.
Francis, W. N., &Kučcera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Gibson, E. J. (1970). The ontogeny of reading.American Psychologist,25, 136–143.
Glushko, R. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 674–691.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. A. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by eye and by ear (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Green, D. W., &Shallice, T. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning.Memory & Cognition,4, 753–758.
Hawkins, H. L., Reicher, G. M., Rogers, M., &Peterson, L. (1976). Flexible coding in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 380–385.
Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. New York: Academic Press.
Humphreys, G. W., &Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dualroute theory of reading.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,8, 689–740.
Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Taylor, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,10, 576–590.
Jared, D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 358–394.
Kay, J., &Marcel, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of nonlexical rules.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 397–414.
Klapp, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 262–267.
Lesch, M. F., &Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 285–294.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 951–966.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 107–128.
Luo, C. R. (1996). How is word meaning accessed in reading? Evidence from the phonologically mediated interference effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 883–895.
Martin, R. C. (1982). The pseudohomophone effect: The role of visual similarity in nonword decisions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,34A, 395–409.
McCusker, L. X., Hillinger, M. L., &Bias, R. G. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading.Psychological Bulletin,89, 217–245.
Meyer, D. E., & Gutschera, K. D. (1975, November).Orthographic versus phonemic processing of printed words. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Denver.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activation verification model for word and letter recognition: The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
Patterson, K., &Marcel, A. J. (1977). Aphasia, dyslexia, and the phonological coding of written words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 307–312.
Perfetti, C. A., &Bell, L. C. (1991). Phonemic activation during first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 473–485.
Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., &Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 59–70.
Perfetti, C. A., &Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 633–643.
Perfetti, C. A., &Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 24–33.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 645–658.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Siple, P. (1974). Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words.Psychological Review,81, 99–118.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 199–252). New York: Academic Press.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Petersen, A., MacDonald, M. C., &Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 48–62.
Smith, F. (1971).Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using design and system principles.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1248–1268.
Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?Memory & Cognition,10, 465–474.
Taft, M. (1991).Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., &Siok, W. W. T. (1996). The activation of early phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 865–882.
Treiman, R., Freyd, J. J., &Baron, J. (1983). Phonological mediation and use of spelling-sound rules in reading of sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 682–700.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., &Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 371–386.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editor, Geoffrey R. Loftus
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, C.R., Johnson, R.A. & Gallo, D.A. Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task. Memory & Cognition 26, 833–843 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211402
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211402