The present, subjective value of a delayed reward is a decreasing function of the duration of the delay. This phenomenon is termed temporal discounting. To determine whether the amount of the reward influences the rate of temporal discounting, we had subjects choose between immediate and delayed hypothetical rewards of different amounts ($100, $2,000, $25,000, and $100,000 delayed rewards). As predicted by psychological models of the choice process, hyperbolic functions described the decrease in the subjective value of the delayed reward as the time until its receipt was increased (R2s from .86 to .99). Moreover, hyperbolic functions consistently provided more accurate descriptions of the data than did exponential functions predicted by an economic model of discounted utility. Rate of discounting decreased in a negatively accelerated fashion as the amount of the delayed reward increased, leveling off by approximately $25,000. These findings are interpreted in the context of different psychological models of choice, and implications for procedures to enhance self-control are discussed.
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological Bulletin,82, 463–496.
Ainslie, G. (1992).Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., &Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study.Management Science,35, 270–284.
Chung, S.-H., &Herrnstein, R. J. (1967). Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,10, 67–74.
Gallant, A. R. (1987).Nonlinear statistical models. New York: Wiley.
Green, L. (1982). Self-control behavior in animals. In V. L. Smith (Ed.),Research in experimental economics (Vol. 2, pp. 129–150). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.
Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1993). Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self control.Behavior & Philosophy,21, 37–47.
Green, L., &Myerson, J. (1996). Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time.American Zoologist,36, 496–505.
Kirby, K. N., &Marakovic, N. N. (1995). Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,64, 22–30.
Kirby, K. N., &Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 100–104.
Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience.Econometrica,28, 287–309.
Loewenstein, G. (1992). The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. In G. Loewenstein & J. Elster (Eds.),Choice over time (pp. 3–34). New York: Russell Sage.
Loewenstein, G., &Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107, 573–597.
Loewenstein, G., &Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice.Journal of Economic Perspectives,3, 181–193.
Logue, A. W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,11, 665–679.
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Myerson, J., &Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,64, 263–276.
Rachlin, H. (1974). Self-control.Behaviorism,2, 94–107.
Rachlin, H., &Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and selfcontrol.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,17, 15–22.
Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., &Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice.Psychological Review,93, 33–45.
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., &Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,55, 233–244.
Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–94.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility.Review of Economic Studies,4, 155–161.
Strotz, R. H. (1956). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization.Review of Economic Studies,23, 165–180.
Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency.Economics Letters,8, 201–207.
About this article
Cite this article
Green, L., Myerson, J. & Mcfadden, E. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory & Cognition 25, 715–723 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211314
- Discount Rate
- Exponential Model
- Hyperbolic Function
- Large Reward
- Hyperbolic Model