Abstract
It was observed by chance that perceived movement of a stationary spot of light in a dark featureless field persists after its induced movement by a moving frame. When the frame was suddenly occluded, apparent movement of the spot persisted in the same direction as prior induced movement. The effect which is compelling and readily reported and referred to as induced subject-relative movement (ISRM) was confirmed and further investigated in four experiments. In the first, the informal observations of ISRM were confirmed using manual tracking to index perceived movement, and in the second, it was shown to occur only very slightly and briefly when the frame merely stopped. In the third experiment, ISRM was shown to occur following two different paths of induced movement, and in the fourth, not to occur following real movement of the spot, which was almost indistinguishable from its induced movement. It is suggested that the effect arises from the absence of a signal for cessation of perceived movement when the frame disappears.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brosgole.L. Induced autokinesis.Perception & Psychophysics. 1967,2, 69–73.
Day, R. H., &Strelow, E. R. Visual aftereffect of movement: Partial or complete reduction in the absence of a patterned surround.Nature, 1971,230, 55–56.
Graybiel, A., &Clark, B. The autokinetic illusion and its significance in night flying.Journal of Aviation Medicine, 1945,16, 111–151.
Hoffman, E. L., Swanden, D. V. K., Baran, S. H., &Rhrer, J. H. Generalization and exposure time as related to autokinetic movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1953,46, 171–177.
Mashhour, M.Psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1964.
Royce, J. R., Carran, A. B., Aftanas, M., Lehman, R. S, &Blumenthal, A. The autokinetic phenomenon.Psychological Bulletin, 1966,65, 243–260
Shaffer, O., &Wallach, H. Extent-of-motion thresholds under subject-relative and object-relative conditions.Perception & Psychophysics, 1996,1, 447–451.
Strelow, E. R., &Day.R. H. Aftereffect of visual movement: Storage in the absence of a visual surround.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,9, 485–486.
Strelow, E. R., &Day, R. H. Visual movement aftereffect: Evidence for independent adaptation to moving target and stationary surround.Vision Research, 1975,15, 117–121.
Wallach, H. Perception of motion.Scientific American, 1959,201, 56–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant A65/15940 from the Australian Research Grants Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, R.H., Dickinson, R.G. & Forster, K.I. Induced subject-relative movement: Persistence of apparent movement of a stationary point after removal of inducing stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics 19, 510–517 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211219
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211219